• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Lightning Rods, Earthquakes, and Regional Identities: Towards a Multi-Scale Framework of Assessing Fracking Risk Perception
【24h】

Lightning Rods, Earthquakes, and Regional Identities: Towards a Multi-Scale Framework of Assessing Fracking Risk Perception

机译：避雷针，地震和区域特征：建立评估分数风险感知的多尺度框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Hydraulic fracturing has provided a persistent, polarizing, and highly politicized source of controversy internationally and in numerous national contexts for just under a decade. This research uses hydraulic fracturing (i.e., fracking) operations in New Zealand as a vignette through which to understand the underlying causes of controversy and the appropriateness of attempts to address them. A multi-method approach using interviews (n = 25), diagrammatic analysis, and newsprint media was applied to evidence two major findings. First, previous attempts to explain fracking controversy based on social constructivist theory lack a multi-scalar approach to the assessment of factors that influence risk perceptions. It is found that risk perception surrounding fracking in New Zealand reflects intra-scalar interactions between factors originating at the international, national, regional, and local scale. Second, there is a concerning absence of critique pertaining to the concept of "social license to operate" (SLO), which has been advocated both internationally and nationally as an appropriate form of stakeholder engagement. This article contributes to the SLO outcomes literature by establishing a need to consider multi-scalar influences on risk perception when explaining diverse SLO outcomes in communities where fracking operations are prospective or already taking place.
机译：在不到十年的时间里，水力压裂已经在国际上和许多国家的背景下，为争议提供了持久，两极化和高度政治化的来源。这项研究使用了新西兰的水力压裂（即压裂）作业作为插图，通过它可以了解引起争议的根本原因以及解决这些问题的适当性。采用访谈法（n = 25），图表分析和新闻纸媒体的多方法方法来证明两个主要发现。首先，先前基于社会建构主义理论解释水力压裂争议的尝试缺乏评估影响风险感知因素的多尺度方法。研究发现，围绕新西兰水力压裂的风险感知反映了国际，国家，地区和地方范围内因素之间的标量内相互作用。其次，关于“社会经营许可证”（SLO）概念的批评缺乏关注，国际和国内都认为这是利益相关者参与的一种适当形式。本文为SLO结果文献做出了贡献，确定了在有可能进行压裂作业或已经进行压裂作业的社区中解释各种SLO结果时，需要考虑对风险感知的多尺度影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号