• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Expert Views on Their Role as Policy Advisor: Pilot Study for the Cases of Electromagnetic Fields, Particulate Matter, and Antimicrobial Resistance
【24h】

Expert Views on Their Role as Policy Advisor: Pilot Study for the Cases of Electromagnetic Fields, Particulate Matter, and Antimicrobial Resistance

机译：专家对他们作为政策顾问的作用的看法：电磁场，颗粒物和抗微生物剂案例的初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This perspective presents empirical data to demonstrate the existence of different expert views on scientific policy advice on complex environmental health issues. These views are partly research-field specific. According to scientific literature, experts differ in the way they provide policy advice on complex issues such as electromagnetic fields (EMF), particulate matter (PM), and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Where some experts feel their primary task is to carry out fundamental research, others actively engage in the policy dialogue. Although the literature provides ideas about expert roles, there exists little empirical underpinning. Our aim is to gather empirical evidence about expert roles. The results of an international study indicated that experts on EMF, PM, and AMR differ in the way they view their role in the policy dialogue. For example, experts differed in their views on the need for precaution and their motivation to initiate stakeholder cooperation. Besides, most experts thought that their views on the risks of EMF/PM/AMR did not differ from those of colleagues. Great dissensus was found in views on the best ways of managing risks and uncertainties. In conclusion, the theoretical ideal-typical roles from the literature can be identified to a certain extent.
机译：该观点提供了经验数据，以证明就复杂环境健康问题的科学政策建议存在不同的专家观点。这些观点部分是针对特定研究领域的。根据科学文献，专家在针对复杂问题（例如电磁场（EMF），颗粒物（PM）和抗微生物剂（AMR））提供政策建议的方式上有所不同。一些专家认为其主要任务是进行基础研究，而其他专家则积极参与政策对话。尽管文献提供了有关专家角色的想法，但几乎没有经验基础。我们的目的是收集有关专家角色的经验证据。一项国际研究的结果表明，EMF，PM和AMR专家在他们在政策对话中的作用看法上存在差异。例如，专家对预防的必要性和发起利益相关者合作的动机有不同的看法。此外，大多数专家认为，他们对EMF / PM / AMR风险的看法与同事没有不同。人们对管理风险和不确定性的最佳方法的观点存在很大的分歧。总之，可以从一定程度上确定文献中理论上理想的典型角色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号