• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Expert Views on Their Role as Policy Advisor: Pilot Study for the Cases of Electromagnetic Fields, Particulate Matter, and Antimicrobial Resistance
【24h】

Expert Views on Their Role as Policy Advisor: Pilot Study for the Cases of Electromagnetic Fields, Particulate Matter, and Antimicrobial Resistance

机译：关于他们作为政策顾问的角色的专家意见：用于电磁场，颗粒物和抗微生物抗性的案例的试验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This perspective presents empirical data to demonstrate the existence of different expert views on scientific policy advice on complex environmental health issues. These views are partly research-field specific. According to scientific literature, experts differ in the way they provide policy advice on complex issues such as electromagnetic fields (EMF), particulate matter (PM), and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Where some experts feel their primary task is to carry out fundamental research, others actively engage in the policy dialogue. Although the literature provides ideas about expert roles, there exists little empirical underpinning. Our aim is to gather empirical evidence about expert roles. The results of an international study indicated that experts on EMF, PM, and AMR differ in the way they view their role in the policy dialogue. For example, experts differed in their views on the need for precaution and their motivation to initiate stakeholder cooperation. Besides, most experts thought that their views on the risks of EMF/PM/AMR did not differ from those of colleagues. Great dissensus was found in views on the best ways of managing risks and uncertainties. In conclusion, the theoretical ideal-typical roles from the literature can be identified to a certain extent.
机译：这种观点介绍了经验数据，以证明对复杂环境健康问题的科学政策建议的存在不同专家意见。这些视图是部分研究领域特定的。根据科学文学，专家在他们提供关于复杂问题的政策建议的方式，例如电磁场（EMF），颗粒物质（PM）和抗微生物抗性（AMR）。一些专家们认为他们的主要任务是开展基础研究，其他人积极参与政策对话。虽然文献提供了关于专家角色的想法，但存在很少的经验性支撑。我们的目标是收集关于专家角色的经验证据。国际研究的结果表明，EMF，PM和AMR的专家在他们在政策对话中观察其作用的方式不同。例如，专家对他们对预防措施的需求及其启动利益相关方合作的动机有所不同。此外，大多数专家认为他们对EMF / PM / AMR风险的看法与同事没有不同。关于管理风险和不确定性的最佳方式，发现了伟大的审议。总之，可以在一定程度上鉴定文献中的理论理想典型的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号