• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature
【24h】

Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature

机译：信任和风险感知：对文献的批判性审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Many studies in the field of risk perception and acceptance of hazards include trust as an explanatory variable. Despite this, the importance of trust has often been questioned. The relevant issue is not only whether trust is crucial but also the form of trust that people rely on in a given situation. In this review, I discuss various trust models and the relationship between trust and affect heuristics. I conclude that the importance of trust varies by hazard and respondent group. Most of the studies use surveys that provide limited information about causality. Future research should focus more on experiments that test whether trust is a consequence of people's attitudes or influences their attitudes toward a technology. Furthermore, there is a need for a better understanding about the factors that determine which heuristics people rely on when evaluating hazards.
机译：风险感知领域的许多研究包括信任作为解释性变量。 尽管如此，信任的重要性往往受到质疑。 相关问题不仅是信任是至关重要的，也是人们在特定情况下依赖的信任形式。 在这篇综述中，我讨论了各种信任模型和信任之间的关系，并影响了启发式。 我得出结论，信任的重要性因危险和受访者组而异。 大多数研究使用调查提供有关因果关系的有限信息。 未来的研究应该更多地关注测试信任是否是人们态度的结果或影响他们对技术的态度。 此外，需要更好地了解确定人们依赖于评估危险时的引发的因素的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号