• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science as Culture >Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Globalization of Converging Technology Policy: Technological Developmentalism in South Korea
【24h】

Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Globalization of Converging Technology Policy: Technological Developmentalism in South Korea

机译：社会技术想象与融合技术政策的全球化：韩国的技术发展主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The United States (US), European Union (EU), and South Korea had different definitions and visions of technological convergence before interacting with each other from the late 2000s. The Korean government has used Western policies as a benchmark but produces a distinct concept of technological convergence due to a particular imaginary of technology as a vehicle for national economic growth. This sociotechnical imaginary of technological developmentalism influences Korea's translation of technological convergence from other jurisdictions. Because the sociotechnical imaginaries of different nations are difficult to communicate across national contexts, the translation of visions often changes the original meaning of things like technological convergence. Western sociotechnical imaginaries such as human enhancement and sustainable development do not translate well into South Korea due to the national imaginary of technological developmentalism. First, Korea's Lee administration predominantly envisioned converging technology (CT) as a new growth engine, in contrast to the US and EU which emphasize visions of trans-humanist or sustainable futures respectively. Second, the Park administration's CT vision imitates the Western societal challenge-driven rationale, but this vision was not enacted. As such, the democratic, sustainable imaginary of societal challenge-driven innovation is not easily translated into Korea's national imaginary or technology policy.
机译：从2000年代后期开始相互影响之前，美国（美国），欧盟（EU）和韩国对技术融合有不同的定义和愿景。韩国政府以西方政策为基准，但由于对技术作为国民经济增长工具的特殊想象，产生了独特的技术融合概念。技术发展主义的这种社会技术想象影响了韩国从其他司法管辖区对技术融合的翻译。由于不同国家的社会技术想象者难以在不同国家的背景下进行交流，因此愿景的转换通常会改变诸如技术融合之类的事物的原始含义。由于国家对技术发展主义的想象，诸如人类增强和可持续发展之类的西方社会技术想象并不能很好地转化为韩国。首先，与美国和欧盟分别强调超人类主义或可持续未来的愿景相反，韩国李政权主要将融合技术（CT）视为新的增长引擎。其次，公园政府的CT构想模仿了西方社会挑战驱动的基本原理，但这一构想并未得到实现。因此，社会挑战驱动型创新的民主，可持续的想象很难转化为韩国的国家想象或技术政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号