...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >From pure science to participatory knowledge production? Researchers' perceptions on science-policy interface in bioenergy policy
【24h】

From pure science to participatory knowledge production? Researchers' perceptions on science-policy interface in bioenergy policy

机译：从纯科学到参与式知识生产？研究人员对生物能源政策中的科学政策界面的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There is a plea for dialogue and interaction between researchers and policymakers, particularly in relation to burning and complex societal problems. However, day-to-day science-policy interaction remains a challenge. By investigating researchers' perspectives on challenges and opportunities of evolving interaction between science and policy, this article contributes to the ongoing discussions on workable and effective science-policy interface. The analysis, based on twelve in-depth interviews with experienced forest bioenergy researchers working at different organizations in Finland, shows that researchers appreciate a variety of roles and contributions from pure scientist to participatory knowledge production. Paradoxically, researchers ideologically still adhere to objective and linear knowledge production, which is, however, associated with multiple challenges such as politi-cization of science, disuse or misuse of scientific knowledge and communication. The article concludes that more nuanced consideration and acknowledgement of science-policy context as well as researchers' role in it could create mutual benefits for research and policy.
机译：研究人员和政策制定者之间存在对话和互动，特别是与燃烧和复杂的社会问题有关。然而，日常科学政策互动仍然是一个挑战。通过调查研究人员对发展科学和政策互动的挑战和机遇的观点，本文有助于正在进行的关于可行和有效的科学政策界面的讨论。基于芬兰不同组织工作的经验丰富的森林生物能源研究人员的十二次深入访谈的分析表明，研究人员欣赏纯科学家对参与式知识生产的各种作用和贡献。矛盾的是，研究人员仍然坚持客观和线性知识生产，然而，与科学，废弃或滥用科学知识和沟通等多种挑战相关。本文得出结论，对科学政策背景的细微审慎审议和承认在其中的作用以及研究和政策的互惠互利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号