• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Neurobiologically Poor? Brain Phenotypes, Inequality, and Biosocial Determinism
【24h】

Neurobiologically Poor? Brain Phenotypes, Inequality, and Biosocial Determinism

机译：神经生物学差吗？脑表型，不平等和生物社会决定论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The rise of neuroplasticity has led to new fields of study about the relation between social inequalities and neurobiology, including investigations into the "neuroscience of poverty." The neural phenotype of poverty proposed in recent neuroscientific research emerges out of classed, gendered, and racialized inequalities that not only affect bodies in material ways but also shape scientific understandings of difference. An intersectional, sociomaterial approach is needed to grasp the implications of neuroscientific research that aims to both produce and repair neurobiological difference. Following Benjamin's critique of the "carceral imagination" of technoscience, this article considers how such research may fix in terms of helping, or in contrast, fix by classifying and reifying, vulnerable subjects. I address the potential for biosocial determinism in linking neural phenotypes and social problems. I use an intersectional approach to consider the presence and absence of race in this body of research and explore how some methodological and conceptual framings of the "brain on poverty" mark poor and minority children for intervention in concert with neoliberal approaches to poverty.
机译：神经可塑性的兴起导致了关于社会不平等与神经生物学之间关系的新研究领域，包括对“贫困的神经科学”的研究。最近的神经科学研究中提出的贫困的神经表型来自于分类，性别和性别。种族不平等，不仅在物质上影响身体，而且还会塑造对差异的科学理解。需要一种交叉的社会材料方法来掌握旨在产生和修复神经生物学差异的神经科学研究的意义。继本杰明对技术科学的“肉体想象力”提出批评之后，本文考虑了这种研究如何在帮助或相反地通过对易受害对象进行分类和分类方面进行修复。我探讨了在将神经表型和社会问题联系起来时生物社会决定论的潜力。我使用交叉的方法来考虑在这一研究机构中种族的存在与否，并探索“贫困之脑”的一些方法论和概念框架如何标记贫困儿童和少数民族儿童与新自由主义的贫困干预相结合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号