• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Neurobiologically Poor? Brain Phenotypes, Inequality, and Biosocial Determinism
【24h】

Neurobiologically Poor? Brain Phenotypes, Inequality, and Biosocial Determinism

机译：神经生物学上穷人？脑表型，不等式和生物社会决定论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The rise of neuroplasticity has led to new fields of study about the relation between social inequalities and neurobiology, including investigations into the "neuroscience of poverty." The neural phenotype of poverty proposed in recent neuroscientific research emerges out of classed, gendered, and racialized inequalities that not only affect bodies in material ways but also shape scientific understandings of difference. An intersectional, sociomaterial approach is needed to grasp the implications of neuroscientific research that aims to both produce and repair neurobiological difference. Following Benjamin's critique of the "carceral imagination" of technoscience, this article considers how such research may fix in terms of helping, or in contrast, fix by classifying and reifying, vulnerable subjects. I address the potential for biosocial determinism in linking neural phenotypes and social problems. I use an intersectional approach to consider the presence and absence of race in this body of research and explore how some methodological and conceptual framings of the "brain on poverty" mark poor and minority children for intervention in concert with neoliberal approaches to poverty.
机译：神经塑性性的兴起导致了关于社会不平等和神经生物学之间关系的新研究领域，包括调查“贫困神经科学”。最近神经科学研究的贫困神经表型出现出课堂，性别和种族化的不平等，不仅影响物质方式，而且造成了对差异的科学理解。需要交叉的社会材料方法来掌握神经科学研究的影响，旨在产生和修复神经生物学差异。在本杰明对技术科学研究的“心理想象”的批评之后，本文考虑了这些研究如何通过分类和重新泄露脆弱的科目来解决这些研究。我解决了在联系神经表型和社会问题方面的生物社会决定论的潜力。我使用交叉方法来考虑这个研究机构的存在和缺乏种族，并探讨了“贫困的大脑”的方法论和概念框架，标志着穷人和少数民族儿童在音乐会上与新自由主义的贫困方法进行干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号