How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L'Aquila Trial

Federico Brandmayr

首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L'Aquila Trial

【24h】

How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L'Aquila Trial

机译：社会科学家如何在法庭上提出因果主张：拉奎拉审判的证据

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This paper contributes to two topics that have received insufficient attention in science and technology studies: the social dimensions of causal reasoning and how the knowledge-making site of expert testimony affects the production and reception of social scientific knowledge. It deals with how social scientists make causal claims when testifying as expert witnesses in trials where causal claims are relevant, using as a case study the so-called L'Aquila trial, in which experts were summoned by the parties to testify on the causes of risk-related behavior by the inhabitants of an Italian city in early 2009. In particular, I analyze the process of selection of causal loci, the attribution and removal of agency, the increase and decrease of causal factors in the explanation of an event, and the delimitation of the expla-nandum. As a general insight derived from the case, it is argued that the position of experts in a trial-which side summons them-may be a more important factor than their branch of expertise to account for certain types of these practices.

机译：本文提出了两个在科学和技术研究中尚未引起足够重视的主题：因果推理的社会维度以及专家证言的知识形成站点如何影响社会科学知识的产生和接受。它涉及社会科学家在作为因果主张相关的审判中作为专家证人作证时如何提出因果主张，以所谓的L'Aquila审判为例，在该案中，当事方召集了专家以就因果关系的成因作证。 2009年初，一个意大利城市的居民进行了与风险相关的行为。特别是，我分析了事件因果的选择过程，代理的归因和删除，事件原因的解释中因果因素的增加和减少以及说明的定界。作为从该案例中得出的一般见解，有人认为，专家在审判中的地位-召集他们-可能比其专门知识部门对这些类型的某些行为进行解释更为重要。

著录项

来源
《Science, Technology and Human Values》 |2017年第3期|346-380|共35页
作者
Federico Brandmayr;
展开▼
作者单位

University Paris-Sorbonne (GEMASS), Paris, France;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
expertise; forensic evidence; law and science; causal attribution; social knowledge; responsibility;

机译：专业知识;法医证据;法律和科学;因果归因;社会知识;责任;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. When Boundary Organisations Fail: Identifying Scientists and Civil Servants in L'Aquila Earthquake Trial [J] . Brandmayr Federico Science as Culture . 2021,第2期

机译：当边界组织失败时：识别L'Aquila地震审判中的科学家和公务员
2. Fault lines at the interface of science and policy: Interpretative responses to the trial of scientists in L'Aquila [J] . Yeo Michael Earth-Science Reviews: The International Geological Journal Bridging the Gap between Research Articles and Textbooks . 2014,第Null期

机译：科学与政策交界处的断层线：对拉奎拉科学家审判的解释性回应
3. Scientists on trial over L'Aquila deaths [J] . NICOLA NOSENGO Nature . 2011,第7349期

机译：拉奎拉之死受审科学家
4. Empirical Study on Court Investigation of Documentary Evidence in Criminal Trial: Taking the Substantive Trial Demonstration Court of the Court of C City as a Sample for Analysis [C] . Xin Peng International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education . 2018

机译：刑事审判中纪录证据法院调查的实证研究：以C城市法院的实质试验示范法院为分析
5. When the appellate court takes fresh evidence in a civil case, should the court dispose of the case immediately or order a new trial? [D] . Sase, Hiroshi 2016

机译：当上诉法院在民事案件中获得新的证据时，法院是否应立即处理该案或下令重新审判？
6. Causal language and strength of inference in academic and media articles shared in social media (CLAIMS): A systematic review [O] . Noah Haber, Emily R. Smith, Ellen Moscoe, 2012

机译：社会媒体中共享的学术和媒体文章中的因果语言和推理强度（系统要求）：系统综述
7. nyk of the Lviv University. Series Law KEYWORDS abuse of authority, abuse of power, abuse of official status, abuse of office acts of the European Union, international legal regulation, employment, right to free movement advocacy, advocate activity, advocacy science, advocatologie, theory of advocacy appeal proceeding, grounds to judgement revision, inconsistency of the court’s findings at first instance with the actual circumstances of the criminal proceedings, cancellation or alteration of the judgment charity organization, founder, assets of charity organization, constituent documents criminal proceedings, subjects of criminal proceedings, the suspect, the suspect law, criminal procedure, international standards employer’s duty, right to the moral injury compensation, social insurance from an industrial accident, social need, labour dispute forms of the legal actions of the collective of employees historical and legal science department, scientific activity law enforcement equipment, individual legal act, the means of forming the content of the enforcement act, requirements for registration of individual legal act attributes (properties) of acts of law legal formula (construction), qualified corpus delicti of a crime, degree of social danger, crime-forming feature legal social community legal technique, technology, legal act, legal system, lawmaking legitimacy, investigation of crime, concept of criminalistics, criminalistics recommendations, tactical methods measures aimed at providing criminal proceedings, procedural sanction, monetary penalty, pre-trial investigation national implementation, forms of implementation, implementation practice, European states, international treaties participant, shareholder, partnership, acquisition, changing, suspension proof, probability, likelihood, credibility in evidence, reliability scientific school, research, development land, agricultural and environmental law, Lviv Scientific School land, agricultural and environmental law the High Council of Justice of Ukraine, the National Council of Justice of the Republic of Poland, judges’ independence, international standards of the judiciary the presumption of the labor legal personality OPEN JOURNAL SYSTEMS Journal Help USER Username Password Remember me Login NOTIFICATIONS View Subscribe LANGUAGE Select LanguageSubmit JOURNAL CONTENT Search Search Scope Search Browse By Issue By Author By Title Other Journals FONT SIZE Make font size smallerMake font size defaultMake font size larger INFORMATION For Readers For Authors For Librarians HOME ABOUT LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH CURRENT ARCHIVES ANNOUNCEMENTS Home > No 67 (2018) > Марін ONCE AGAIN ON THE RETROACTIVE EFFECT OF THE CRIMINAL LAW IN TIME IN THE ASPECT OF INDIRECT CRIMINALIZATION [O] . Oleksandr Marin 2018

机译：LVIV大学的尼克。系列律师关键词滥用权威，滥用权力，滥用官方地位，滥用欧盟办公室行为，国际法律监管，就业，自由运动倡导，倡导活动，倡导科学，倡导性宣传理论，倡导呼吁的理论，理由修改，法院调查结果的不一致事实，判决慈善组织的实际情况，取消或改变判决慈善机构，慈善组织的创始人，慈善机构资产，组成文件刑事诉讼，刑事诉讼主题，嫌疑人，嫌疑法，刑事诉讼，国际标准雇主的责任，道德伤害赔偿权，社会保险从工业事故，社会需求，劳动争端形式的员工历史和法律科学部的法律行为，科学活动执法设备，个人法律法案，制定执法法案的内容，法律法律公式（建设）行为的个人法律法案（属性），犯罪的合格犯罪，社会危险程度，犯罪形成特征法律社会社会法律技术，技术，法律法，法律制度，立法合法性，犯罪调查，犯罪概念，犯罪建议，战术方法旨在提供刑事诉讼，程序制裁，货币罚款，预审调查预审国家实施，执行形式，实施实践，欧洲国家，国际条约参与者，股东，伙伴关系，收购，不断变化，暂停证明，概率，可能性，可信度在证据，可靠性科学学校，研究，开发土地，农业和环境法，利沃科学校园，农业和环境法律议理乌克兰的冰，波兰共和国国家司法委员会，法官的独立，国际标准的司法部门劳动法人的推定开放期刊系统期刊帮助用户用户名密码记住我登录通知查看订阅语言选择lobsumberubmit期刊内容搜索搜索范围搜索按问题浏览作者标题在间接刑事定罪方面，再次对刑法的追溯效应及时

How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L'Aquila Trial

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅