• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >On the Tacit Governance of Research by Uncertainty: How Early Stage Researchers Contribute to the Governance of Life Science Research
【24h】

On the Tacit Governance of Research by Uncertainty: How Early Stage Researchers Contribute to the Governance of Life Science Research

机译：论不确定性对研究的默认治理：早期研究者如何对生命科学研究的治理做出贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The experience of uncertainties in exploring the unknown-and dealing with them-is a key characteristic of what it means to be a life science researcher, but we have only started to understand how this characteristic shapes cultures of knowledge production, particularly in times when other-more social-uncertainties enter the field. Although the lab studies tradition has explored the workings of epistemic uncertainties, the range of potent uncertainty experiences in research cultures has been broadened within the neoliberal reorganization of academic institutions. Most importantly, the stronger dependency on competitive project funding has led to increased social uncertainties. Being employed part-time and for shorter periods of time, researchers often find themselves in the precarious situation of high employment uncertainty. This article argues that the currently predominant form of organizing academic research (the project) creates a structural link between epistemic and social uncertainties. It then describes empirically different modes of coping with these uncertainties that researchers deploy and that seem to have become a variable in the governance of research cultures. To do so, it takes the academic life sciences in Austria as an example and explores them using approaches from both science and technology studies and labor studies.
机译：探索不确定性和处理不确定性的经验是成为生命科学研究者意味着什么的关键特征，但是我们才刚刚开始理解这种特征如何影响知识生产文化，特别是在其他情况下-更多的社会不确定因素进入该领域。尽管实验室研究的传统探索了认知不确定性的工作原理，但在学术机构的新自由主义重组中，研究文化中潜在不确定性经验的范围已经扩大。最重要的是，对竞争项目资金的依赖性越来越大，导致社会不确定性增加。研究人员被兼职并且工作时间较短，经常处于就业不确定性高的不稳定状态。本文认为，目前组织学术研究（该项目）的主要形式在认知和社会不确定性之间建立了结构性联系。然后，它描述了经验上不同的应对方式，以应对研究人员部署的不确定性，这些不确定性似乎已成为研究文化治理中的变量。为此，以奥地利的学术生命科学为例，并使用科学技术研究和劳动研究的方法对其进行了探索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号