• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Gender and Clarity of Evaluation among Academic Scientists in Research Universities
【24h】

Gender and Clarity of Evaluation among Academic Scientists in Research Universities

机译：研究型大学学术科学家的性别评价和清晰性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article addresses a telling issue in academic science: the clarity of criteria for tenure and promotion reported by women and men faculty in scientific fields. Data from faculty surveyed in nine US research universities point to ways that formal and informal organizational indicators predict the clarity of evaluation reported by women and men. Unexpected patterns occur by gender. Among men, both formal and informal organizational indicators, as well as field, predict their reported clarity of evaluation. Among women, however, only informal organizational indicators, namely, frequency of speaking with faculty about research and departmental climate, are significant predictors. Further, overall, informal indicators are stronger predictors of clarity than are formal indicators, and some field differences occur. These findings have implications for national and regional science policies and for the practices and policies of universities.
机译：本文解决了学术科学中一个明显的问题：科学领域的男女教授报告的任职和晋升标准的明确性。来自美国九所研究型大学的研究人员提供的数据表明，正式和非正式组织指标可以预测男女报告的评估是否清晰。性别出现意外的模式。在男性中，正式和非正式的组织指标以及领域都可以预测他们报告的评估的清晰度。然而，在女性中，只有非正式的组织指标，即与研究人员和部门气候相关的教师讲话的频率是重要的预测指标。此外，总体而言，非正式指标比正式指标更能明确说明问题，并且会出现一些领域差异。这些发现对国家和地区科学政策以及大学的实践和政策都有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号