• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Post-Normal Science in Practice at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
【24h】

Post-Normal Science in Practice at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency

机译：荷兰环境评估局的实践后普通科学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

About a decade ago, the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL) unwittingly embarked on a transition from a technocratic model of science advising to the paradigm of "post-normal science" (PNS). In response to a scandal around uncertainty management in 1999, a Guidance for "Uncertainty Assessment and Communication" was developed with advice from the initiators of the PNS concept and was introduced in 2003. This was followed in 2007 by a "Stakeholder Participation" Guidance. In this article, the authors provide a combined insider/outsider perspective on the transition process. The authors assess the extent to which the PNS paradigm has delivered new approaches in the agency's practice and analyze two projects-on long-term options for Dutch sustainable development policy and for urban development policy-the latter in somewhat more detail. The authors identify several paradoxes PBL encounters when putting the PNS concept into practice. It is concluded that an openness to other styles of work than the technocratic model has become visible, but that the introduction of the PNS paradigm is still in its early stage.
机译：大约十年前，荷兰环境评估局（PBL）不知不觉地开始了从建议的技术官僚主义模式向“后常态科学”（PNS）范式的转变。为响应1999年有关不确定性管理的丑闻，在PNS概念发起者的建议下，制定了“不确定性评估和交流指南”，并于2003年引入。2007年又引入了“利益相关者参与”指南。在本文中，作者对过渡过程提供了内部/外部观点的结合。作者评估了PNS范式在该机构的实践中提供了新方法的程度，并分析了两个项目-有关荷兰可持续发展政策和城市发展政策的长期选择-后者的详细信息。作者将PNS概念付诸实践时发现了PBL遇到的一些悖论。结论是，对技术专家制模式以外的其他工作方式的开放性已经可见，但是PNS范式的引入仍处于早期阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号