...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Social Dynamics: A journal of African studies >Indigenous authorities and the post‐colonial state: the domestication of indigeneity and African nationalism in South Africa
【24h】

Indigenous authorities and the post‐colonial state: the domestication of indigeneity and African nationalism in South Africa

机译：土著当局和后殖民地国家：南非的土著化和非洲民族主义的驯化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Since the advent of the African Union, confidence in Africa’s renaissance has been high, but a number of state‐civil society anxieties continue to challenge stable social relations. One area of anxiety concerns post‐colonial African governments’ attempts to incorporate traditional authorities into largely secular, constitutional democracies. Indigenous authorities have been a significant part of South Africa’s colonial and apartheid history - in resistance and collaboration - and are widely imagined to be part of the country’s political culture for the foreseeable future. The post‐1994 African nationalist government sought to deal with the indigenous through the formal regulation of indigenous authorities and the integration of indigenous institutions into the fledgling democracy, without adjusting the provisions of South Africa’s culture of secular constitutionalism. In this article, I explore the possibility that the post‐apartheid state’s promotion of religious, linguistic and cultural rights, and its protection of indigenous authorities through legislation serve to domesticate and exclude such organic, indigenous institutions and social movements from matters of state making. I argue that while such domestication is a feature of the contemporary situation, it is made more complicated by the sources of sacred power, which ideas of tradition and indigeneity offer African nationalism.View full textDownload full textKeywordsindigeneity, post‐colonial, post‐apartheid, African nationalism, nativism, rightsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533950903561239
机译：自非洲联盟成立以来，人们对非洲的复兴抱有很高的信心，但许多州的公民社会忧虑继续挑战着稳定的社会关系。焦虑的一个方面是“非洲殖民政府”试图将传统当局纳入世俗的宪政民主之后的担忧。在抵抗和合作方面，土著当局一直是南非殖民和种族隔离历史的重要组成部分，并且在可预见的未来，土著当局被广泛认为是南非政治文化的一部分。 1994年后的非洲民族主义政府寻求通过对土著当局的正式监管以及将土著机构纳入刚刚起步的民主国家来与土著打交道，而没有调整南非世俗宪政文化的规定。在本文中，我探讨了种族隔离制后国家对宗教，语言和文化权利的促进，以及其通过立法对土著当局的保护，是否有可能将这种有机的，土著的机构和社会运动纳入国内事务并从中排除的状态。我认为，尽管这种驯化是当代形势的特征，但神圣力量的来源却使这种情况更加复杂，而传统和土著思想为非洲民族主义提供了神圣的权力。查看全文下载全文关键字土著，后殖民地，后种族隔离，非洲民族主义，本土主义，权利相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，service_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，pubid： ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533950903561239

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号