...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Social Sciences in China >Comparison of residents' committees in two Chinese cities: Shanghai and Shenyang
【24h】

Comparison of residents' committees in two Chinese cities: Shanghai and Shenyang

机译：上海和沉阳两个中国城市的居民委员会比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

“”“” “()()()()” The residents' committee as an affiliate of the sub-district office actually plays a role much greater than that of a “self-governing mass organization” as defined by law. Owing to path dependence arising from their long-time role as agents of the government, residents' committee staff are naturally used to regarding daily political administration closely related to community development as part of internal community affairs. Therefore, community building is essentially the construction of a governance structure in grassroots society, which entails state forces vacating some space to allow the self-operation of grass-roots society. To realize this goal, the critical precondition rests in that the management and services of the functional departments of government must hit the mark. Creative institutional reform involves establishing a community governance system consisting of a “community-building guidance committee (government agency), community management committee (social association), community workers (professional service body), community residents' committee (community self-governing organization).”
机译：“”“”“（）（）（）（）”作为街道办事处附属机构的居民委员会实际上比法律规定的“自治群众组织”发挥更大的作用。由于长期担任政府代理人而产生的路径依赖，居民委员会的工作人员自然习惯于将与社区发展紧密相关的日常政治管理视为内部社区事务的一部分。因此，社区建设本质上是基层社会治理结构的构建，它需要国家力量腾出一些空间来允许基层社会自我运作。要实现这一目标，关键的先决条件在于政府职能部门的管理和服务必须达到目标。创新的体制改革包括建立一个社区治理体系，该体系由“社区建设指导委员会（政府机构），社区管理委员会（社会协会），社区工作者（专业服务机构），社区居民委员会（社区自治组织）”组成。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号