Revisiting Aunt Fanny: Evaluating Professional Writing

Randy H. Magena* amp; Jed G. Magenb

首页> 外文期刊>Social Work Education: The International Journal >Revisiting Aunt Fanny: Evaluating Professional Writing

【24h】

Revisiting Aunt Fanny: Evaluating Professional Writing

机译：重温范妮姨妈：评估专业写作

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine how practitioners evaluate professional writing. Social workers and psychiatrists were randomly presented with one of three case summaries and an assessment, purportedly written by a student. In fact, subjects were presented with the same general assessment. The average rating was between 3 and 5 on a 7-point scale. Statistically significant differences were attributable to theoretical orientation. Content analyses indicated concern with the use of jargon and failure to identify strengths. General assessments being rated as positive are discussed in terms of social work training and professional culture.View full textDownload full textKeywordsStudents, Skills Teaching, Knowledge Assessment, Inter-professional Perspectives, Continuing Professional Development, Practice TeachingRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615471003599327

机译：这项研究的目的是检验从业人员如何评价专业写作。向社会工作者和精神科医生随机提供了三个案例摘要之一，并据称由一名学生撰写了评估。实际上，受试者接受了相同的总体评估。 7分制的平均评分在3到5之间。统计上的显着差异可归因于理论取向。内容分析表明人们对使用行话和无法确定优势感到担忧。在社会工作培训和专业文化方面讨论了被评为正面的一般评估。查看全文下载全文关键词学生，技能教学，知识评估，跨行业视角，持续专业发展，实践教学相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“ Taylor＆弗朗西斯在线”，services_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，美味，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615471003599327

著录项

来源
《Social Work Education: The International Journal》 |2010年第7期|p.792-809|共18页
作者
Randy H. Magena* amp; Jed G. Magenb;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. To Get Candy From Aunt Fanny Quit Teasing Cousin Danny [J] . Australian Gold, Gem and Treasure Magazine . 2020,第3期

机译：从姨妈·曼尼戒烟诱惑堂兄丹尼获得糖果
2. Growing up with books: Fanny Seward's book collecting, reading, and writing in mid-nineteenth-century New York state [J] . Stam DC Libraries & culture . 2006,第2期

机译：与书籍一起成长：范妮·塞沃德（Fanny Seward）在19世纪中叶的纽约州收集，阅读和写作书籍
3. Sweet Fanny Adams Revisited [J] . Tony (A. L.) Rice The Mariner's mirror . 2016,第4期

机译：甜范妮·亚当斯再访
4. Determination and Stochasticity of Hierarchical Systems in Lingual Synergy and Their Application in Evaluation of the Writing and Speaking Styles of Professionals [C] . Bikesh Ospanova, Saule Kazhikenova, Mukhtar Sadykov, International conference on graphic and image processing . 2013

机译：语言协同作用中等级系统的确定性和随机性及其在专业人员写作和口语风格评估中的应用
5. The Effectiveness of Professional Development in Teaching Writing-to-Learn Strategies for Science: An Evaluative Case Study. [D] . Kravchuk, Deborah A. 2015

机译：专业发展在科学写作到学习策略教学中的有效性：评估案例研究。
6. A Professional Development Activity to Better Support International Graduate Teaching Assistants in Evaluating Scientific Writing [O] . Lisa L. Walsh, Zhigang Jia, Julianne Vernon 2020

机译：开展专业发展活动以更好地支持国际研究生教学助理评估科学写作
7. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the 1995 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure) developed in collaboration with the international society for heart and lung transplantation endorsed by the heart failure society of america51The document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Board of Trustees in November 2001 and the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in September 2001.52When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association would appreciate the following citation format: Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, Cinquegrani MP, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Goldstein S, Gregoratos G, Jessup ML, Noble RJ, Packer M, Silver MA, Stevenson LW. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:2101–13.53The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association make every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.54This document, as well as the corresponding full-text guidelines, is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org) and the American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org). Single reprints of the executive summary are available for $5.00 each by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Educational Services, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. To purchase additional reprints up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342, or e-mail pubauth@heart.org (specify version: Executive Summary—71-0125; Full Text—71-1026).55© 2001 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Hunt Sharon A, Baker David W, Chin Marshall H, 2001

机译：ACC / AHA成人慢性心力衰竭评估和管理指南：执行摘要美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（委员会修订1995年心脏评估和管理指南与美国心力衰竭学会认可的国际心脏和肺移植协会合作51）该文件于2001年11月获得美国心脏病学会理事会的批准，并于2001年9月获得美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会的批准.52引用本文件时，美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会将赞赏以下引用格式：Hunt SA，Baker DW，Chin MH，Cinquegrani MP，Feldman AM，Francis GS，Ganiats TG，Goldstein S，Gregoratos G，Jessup ML，Noble RJ，Packer M，Silver MA，Stevenson LW。 ACC / AHA成人慢性心力衰竭评估和管理指南：摘要：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（修订1995年《美国心脏病学会评估和管理指南》的委员会心脏衰竭）。 J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38：2101–13.53美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会竭尽全力避免由于外部关系或个人，专业或其他原因而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。写作小组成员的商业利益。具体而言，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组审查，在第一次会议上口头报告给写作小组的所有成员，并在发生变化时进行更新。54本文档以及相应的全文指南可在万维网上找到。美国心脏病学院（www.acc.org）和美国心脏协会（www.americanheart.org）的网站。致电800-253-4636（仅适用于美国）或写信给美国心脏病，教育服务学院，地址为9111 Old Georgetown Road，Bethesda，MD 20814-1699，可以执行摘要的单个重印本，每张5.00美元。要购买最多999份的其他重印本，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671； 1000或更多副本，请致电214-706-1466，传真214-691-6342或电子邮件pubauth@heart.org（指定版本：执行摘要-71-0125；全文-71-1026）。55©2001美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会有限公司
8. WE: A Writing Environment for Professionals [R] . Smith, J. B., Weiss, S. F., Ferguson, G. J., 1986

机译：WE：专业人士的写作环境

Revisiting Aunt Fanny: Evaluating Professional Writing

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅