...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal >Rural Community Views on the Role of Local and Extralocal Interests in Public Lands Governance
【24h】

Rural Community Views on the Role of Local and Extralocal Interests in Public Lands Governance

机译：农村社区对地方和地方利益在公共土地治理中的作用的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Based on in-depth interviews with residents on the Rocky Mountain Front in Montana, this article examines how disagreements about the appropriate role of local interests influence local conflict over public lands. Residents who advocated that local interests should be privileged framed the conflict in terms of class, social standing, and fairness. While some residents were clearly venue shopping (advocating the level of decision making where they believed they could achieve their goals), others supported the decision-making level they believed to be most democratic. We found that claims for increased local influence were not necessarily tied to support for development of public lands. Antigovernment sentiment was contributing to local resistance of extralocal proposals, and national attention to the area had further entrenched and polarized local views. Disagreement about the decision-making process and the conflation of conflicts over policy process with conflicts over policy outcome made local disputes over public lands particularly intractable.View full textDownload full textKeywordscommunity-based conservation, environmental conflict, public lands policy, rural communities, western environmental valuesRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920903005787
机译：基于对蒙大拿州落基山脉前线居民的深入采访，本文探讨了关于地方利益的适当作用的分歧如何影响公共土地上的地方冲突。主张主张地方利益应享有特权的居民从阶级，社会地位和公平的角度来界定冲突。虽然有些居民显然是在现场购物（在他们认为自己可以实现目标的地方提倡决策水平），但其他居民则支持他们认为最民主的决策水平。我们发现，增加当地影响力的主张并不一定与支持公共土地的发展有关。反政府情绪加剧了当地对地方性建议的抵制，全国对该地区的关注进一步巩固了当地的观点并使之两极化。关于决策过程的分歧以及政策过程中的冲突与政策结果中的冲突的并置，使得当地在公共土地上的纠纷特别棘手。查看全文下载全文关键词社区保护，环境冲突，公共土地政策，农村社区，西方环境valuesRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920903005787

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号