首页> 外文期刊>Sophia >Hell Despite Vagueness: A Response to Sider
【24h】

Hell Despite Vagueness: A Response to Sider

机译:尽管含糊不清地狱:对Sider的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ted Sider argues that a binary afterlife is inconsistent with a proportionally just God because no just criterion for placing persons in such an afterlife exists. I provide a possible account whereby God can remain proportionally just and allow a binary afterlife. On my account, there is some maximum amount of people God can allow into Heaven without sacrificing some greater good. God gives to all people at least their due but chooses to allow some who do not deserve Heaven to enter out of grace. Although this model implies a precise cutoff between those who enter Heaven and those who do not, I have argued that there is a precise point where God best serves justice and some greater good. Although God’s actions may appear arbitrary and ‘whimsically generous,’ it is merely because we are ignorant of the precise cutoff point that best serves his purposes.
机译:泰德·西德(Ted Sider)认为,二元来世与成比例的公正上帝不一致,因为不存在将人置于这样来世的公正标准。我提供了一个可能的解释,上帝可以按比例保持公正并允许二元来世。以我的说法,在不牺牲更大利益的情况下,上帝可以允许一些最大的人进入天堂。上帝至少给了所有人应得的,但选择让一些不值得天堂的人走出恩典。尽管这种模式暗示了进入天堂的人与未进入天堂的人之间的精确界限,但我认为,有一个确切的点,即上帝最能为正义和更大的利益服务。尽管上帝的举动似乎是武断的,并且“异想天开”,但这仅仅是因为我们不知道最能满足他目的的精确起点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Sophia》 |2011年第1期|p.221-232|共12页
  • 作者

    Matthew Konieczka;

  • 作者单位

    Saint Anselm College, 100 St. Anselm Dr. #1651, Manchester, NH, 03102, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Sider; Vagueness; Hell; Heaven; Justice;

    机译:西德;模糊;地狱;天堂;正义;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号