...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Space policy >The Quantitative Analysis of Space Policy: A Review of Current Methods and Future Directions
【24h】

The Quantitative Analysis of Space Policy: A Review of Current Methods and Future Directions

机译：空间政策的定量分析：对当前方法和未来方向的审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Decades of space policy research have yielded an eclectic, multidisciplinary research agenda replete with findings that are relevant for theory and policy. Absent from the literature, however, is a systematic review and discussion of the data and research methods used to ascertain these findings. This is important for research progress because data and method choice have implications for the validity of the findings, potential contributions to theory, and efficacy of suggested policy prescriptions. Motivated by advances in computational social science, this article reviews the quantitative space policy literature and finds scope for further development with respect to data sources, method selection, and substantive topics of inquiry. Given these findings, two methodological areas are introduced, namely text and network analysis, and their utility is illustrated through an extension of a previous public opinion study, as well as a novel application regarding state support for international space law. This review might be relevant to scholars and practitioners interested in the empirical study of space policy. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：几十年的太空政策研究已经产生了一种折衷的多学科研究议程，与理论和政策有关的调查结果。然而，从文献中缺席，是对用于确定这些发现的数据和研究方法的系统审查和讨论。这对研究进展很重要，因为数据和方法选择对结果的有效性有影响，对理论的潜在贡献以及建议的政策处方的有效性。本文通过计算社会科学的进展，这篇文章审查了定量空间政策文献，并找到了关于数据来源，方法选择以及查询的实质主题进一步发展的范围。鉴于这些发现，引入了两种方法，即文本和网络分析，通过延长了先前的公众舆论研究，以及关于国际空间法的国家支持的新应用。本综述可能与对空间政策实证研究有兴趣的学者和从业者有关。 （c）2018年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号