• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Spatial cognition and computation >Spatial Perspective Taking is an Embodied Process, but Not for Everyone in the Same Way: Differences Predicted by Sex and Social Skills Score
【24h】

Spatial Perspective Taking is an Embodied Process, but Not for Everyone in the Same Way: Differences Predicted by Sex and Social Skills Score

机译：空间观点采择是一个具体过程，但并非所有人都以相同的方式进行：性别和社交技能得分预测的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We re-analysed visuo-spatial perspective taking data from Kessler and Thomson (2010) plus a previously unpublished pilot with respect to individual- and sex differences in embodied processing (defined as body-posture congruence effects). We found that so-called 'systemisers' (males/low-social-skills) showed weaker embodiment than so-called 'embodiers' (females/high-social-skills). We conclude that 'systemisers' either have difficulties with embodied processing or, alternatively, they have a strategic advantage in selecting different mechanisms or the appropriate level of embodiment. In contrast, 'embodiers' have an advantageous strategy of "deep" embodied processing reflecting their urge to empathise or, alternatively, less flexibility in fine-tuning the involvement of bodily representations.
机译：我们重新分析了视觉空间观点，采用了Kessler和Thomson（2010）的数据，以及之前未发表的关于具体加工中个体和性别差异的定义（定义为身体姿势一致性效应）的飞行员。我们发现，所谓的“系统化者”（男性/低社会技能）表现出比所谓的“实施者”（女性/高社会技能）更弱的体现。我们得出的结论是，“系统管理员”要么在具体处理方面遇到困难，要么在选择不同的机制或适当水平的实施方式方面具有战略优势。相反，“实施者”具有“深层”体现处理的有利策略，反映了他们在微调身体表示的参与上的同理心或不那么灵活的冲动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号