...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >EFFICIENCY, FLEXIBILITY, OR BOTH? EVIDENCE LINKING STRATEGY TO PERFORMANCE IN SMALL FIRMS
【24h】

EFFICIENCY, FLEXIBILITY, OR BOTH? EVIDENCE LINKING STRATEGY TO PERFORMANCE IN SMALL FIRMS

机译：效率，灵活性还是两者兼而有之？证据将战略与小企业的绩效联系起来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper analyzes small firm performance in relation to efficiency and flexibility strategies. Using configuration theory, the authors propose that small firms that pursue efficiency strategies or flexibility strategies outperform those that attempt to pursue both. Additionally, size is used as a configurational attribute to develop competing hypotheses on whether efficiency strategies or flexibility strategies are better suited for small firm performance. In two samples of 200 and 144 privately-held small firms, firms that mixed efficiency and flexibility strategies significantly underperformed. No significant performance differences were found between firms utilizing only efficiency strategies and those utilizing only flexibility strategies.
机译：本文分析了与效率和灵活性策略相关的小公司绩效。使用配置理论，作者建议追求效率策略或灵活性策略的小公司要优于尝试两者兼而有之的小公司。此外，规模被用作配置属性，以制定关于效率策略或灵活性策略是否更适合小型公司绩效的竞争性假设。在200家和144家私营小企业的两个样本中，混合了效率和灵活性策略的企业的表现明显不佳。在仅采用效率策略的公司与仅采用灵活性策略的公司之间，没有发现明显的绩效差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号