首页> 外文期刊>Structural equation modeling >Drawing Conclusions from Cross-Lagged Relationships: Re-Considering the Role of the Time-Interval
【24h】

Drawing Conclusions from Cross-Lagged Relationships: Re-Considering the Role of the Time-Interval

机译:从交叉滞后的关系中得出结论:重新考虑时间间隔的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The cross-lagged panel model (CLPM), a discrete-time (DT) SEM model, is frequently used to gather evidence for (reciprocal) Granger-causal relationships when lacking an experimental design. However, it is well known that CLPMs can lead to different parameter estimates depending on the time-interval of observation. Consequently, this can lead to researchers drawing conflicting conclusions regarding the sign and/or dominance of relationships. Multiple authors have suggested the use of continuous-time models to address this issue.
机译:当缺乏实验设计时,交叉滞后面板模型(CLPM)是离散时间(DT)SEM模型,通常用于收集格兰杰因果关系(互为因果)的证据。但是,众所周知,根据观察的时间间隔,CLPM可能导致不同的参数估计。因此,这可能导致研究人员得出关于关系的符号和/或优势的矛盾结论。多位作者建议使用连续时间模型来解决此问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号