...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Comparative International Development >Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen’sDevelopment as Freedom
【24h】

Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen’sDevelopment as Freedom

机译：集体能力，文化和阿玛蒂亚·森的自由发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Sen showed his usual wisdom and astute judgement in keeping his argument carefully focused and, therefore, elegant and compelling. Nonetheless, the understanding and pursuit of “development as freedom” must go beyond the arguments he lays out. As the global political economy moves with ever greater determination toward the implantation of more thoroughly marketized economic relations, analysts must correspondingly focus more closely on how to prevent market-based power inequalities from undermining “development as freedom.” Centralization of power over the cultural flows that shape preferences is a more subtle form of “unfreedom” than those which Sen highlights, but no less powerful for being subtle. Institutional strategies for facilitating collective capabilities are as important to the expansion of freedom as sustaining formal electoral institutions. Indeed, without possibilities for collective mobilization formal elections too easily become a hollow farce. Sen’s capability approach provides an invaluable analytical and philosophical foundation for those interested in pursuing development as freedom, but it is a foundation that must be built on, not just admired.
机译：森表现出了他一贯的智慧和敏锐的判断力，使他的论点得到了认真的关注，因此显得优雅而引人注目。但是，对“发展为自由”的理解和追求必须超越他提出的论点。随着全球政治经济以更大的决心朝着更彻底地市场化的经济关系发展，分析人员必须相应地更加关注如何防止基于市场的权力不平等破坏“发展为自由”。权力集中于形成偏好的文化流，这比森所强调的更为微妙的“自由”形式，但同样具有微妙的力量。促进集体能力的机构战略对于扩大自由与维持正式选举机构同样重要。确实，如果没有集体动员的可能性，正式选举就很容易成为空心的闹剧。森的能力方法为那些有兴趣追求自由发展的人们提供了宝贵的分析和哲学基础，但这是必须建立的基础，而不仅是值得赞赏的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号