• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in history and philosophy of science >Natural diversity: A neo-essentialist misconstrual of homeostatic property cluster theory in natural kind debates
【24h】

Natural diversity: A neo-essentialist misconstrual of homeostatic property cluster theory in natural kind debates

机译：自然多样性：自然辩论中稳态性质集群理论的新基本主义错误经济

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In natural kind debates, Boyd's famous Homeostatic Property Cluster theory (HPC) is often misconstrued in two ways: Not only is it thought to make for a normative standard for natural kinds, but also to require the homeostatic mechanisms underlying nomological property clusters to be uniform. My argument for the illegitimacy of both overgeneralizations, both on systematic as well as exegetical grounds, is based on the misconstrued view's failure to account for functional kinds in science. I illustrate the combination of these two misconstruals with recent entries into the natural kind debate about emotions. Finally, I examine and reject Stich's "Kornblith-Devitt method" as a potential justification of these misconstruals.
机译：在自然辩论中，Boyd的着名稳态性质集群理论（HPC）通常以两种方式误解：不仅想到了自然种类的规范性标准，还要要求潜在的机制是统一的潜在机制。我对系统性和索引的非法关系的论点，既基于误解视图，无法考虑科学中的功能种类。我说明了这两种错误经济的组合与最近的有关情绪的自然辩论中的条目。最后，我检查并拒绝了Stich的“Kornblith-Devitt方法”作为这些错误繁琐的潜在理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号