• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in history and philosophy of science >Peirce on the justification of abduction
【24h】

Peirce on the justification of abduction

机译：关于绑架的理由辩护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

What sort of justification can be claimed for abduction? In this paper we reconstruct Peirce's answer to this question. We show that in his early works on the logic of science Peirce provided an abductive justification of abduction, and that in his mature writings the early solution is enriched by a reference to the place abduction has in a typical scientific inquiry. Since abduction is the first stage of inquiry by which a hypothesis is suggested and which then has to be subjected to inductive testing, the fundamental abduction (ur-abduction) that justifies abduction has also to be subjected to a verification by means of a fundamental induction (ur-induction), namely that the abduction that abduction is valid is verified by an appeal to the history of science.
机译：绑架可以要求宣布哪种理由？在本文中，我们重建了Peirce对此问题的答案。我们展示在他早期的科学逻辑上，提供了对绑架的绑架理由，并且在他的成熟作品中，早期的解决方案是在典型的科学调查中提到绑架的富集。由于绑架是一个探究的第一阶段，其中建议了一个假设，然后必须受到归纳测试，证明绑架的基本绑架（UR-BECACUTACT）也通过基本诱导来核实（UR-INCUBUTATION），即绑架有效的绑架是通过对科学史上的吸引力来验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号