首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science, part Ⅱ: How to strike the balance
【24h】

Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science, part Ⅱ: How to strike the balance

机译:库恩对波普尔的科学批评和教条主义,第二部分:如何达到平衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper is a supplement to, and provides a proof of principle of, Kuhn vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science: A Resolution at the Croup Level. It illustrates how calculations may be performed in order to determine how the balance between different functions in science-such as imaginative, critical, and dogmatic-should be struck, with respect to confirmation (or corroboration) functions and rules of scientific method.
机译:本文是对库恩与波普尔的《科学的批判与教条主义:克鲁普问题的解决方案》的补充,并提供了原理证明。它说明了如何执行计算以确定关于确认(或证实)功能和科学方法规则的科学中不同功能(例如,想象力,批判性和教条性)之间的平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号