Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: Health status in a blind randomised trial

Frederik Keus; Jolanda de Vries; Hein G. Gooszen; Cornelis J. H. M. van Laarhoven

首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: Health status in a blind randomised trial

【24h】

Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: Health status in a blind randomised trial

机译：腹腔镜与小切口胆囊切除术：一项盲目的随机试验的健康状况

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Gallstones are a major cause of morbidity, and cholecystectomy is a commonly performed procedure. Minimal invasive procedures, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and small-incision cholecystectomy (SIC), have replaced the classical open cholecystectomy. No differences have been found in primary outcome measures between LC and SIC, therefore secondary outcome measures have to be considered to determine preferences. The aim of our study was to examine health status applying evidence-based guidelines in LC and SIC in a randomised trial.

机译：胆结石是发病的主要原因，胆囊切除术是一种常见的手术方法。微创手术，腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）和小切口胆囊切除术（SIC）取代了传统的开放性胆囊切除术。 LC和SIC之间在主要结局指标方面没有发现差异，因此必须考虑使用次要结局指标来确定偏好。我们研究的目的是在随机试验中应用基于证据的LC和SIC指南检查健康状况。

著录项

来源
《Surgical Endoscopy》 |2008年第7期|1649-1659|共11页
作者
Frederik Keus; Jolanda de Vries; Hein G. Gooszen; Cornelis J. H. M. van Laarhoven;
展开▼
作者单位

Department of Surgery Diakonessenhuis Bosboomstraat 1 3582 KE Utrecht The Netherlands;

Department of Medical Psychology Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands;

Department of Surgery University Medical Center Utrecht The Netherlands;

Department of Surgery St. Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg The Netherlands;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
Health status; Cholecystectomy; Surgery; Laparoscopy; Surgery; Laparotomy;

机译：健康状况;胆囊切除术;手术;腹腔镜;手术;开腹手术;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: health status in a blind randomised trial. [J] . Keus F, de-Vries J, Gooszen HG, Surgical Endoscopy . 2008,第7期

机译：腹腔镜与小切口胆囊切除术：一项盲目的随机试验的健康状况。
2. Costs and quality of life of small-incision?open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy?- an expertise-based randomised controlled trial [J] . Mats H. Rosenmüller, Erik Nilsson, Fredrik Lindberg, BMC Gastroenterology . 2017,第1期

机译：小切口“开腹胆囊切除术和腹腔镜胆囊切除术”的成本和生活质量-基于专业知识的随机对照试验
3. Reply to: Doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3: Re: Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomised trial (2010 (24):1842-1848) and doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1921-9: Re: α-Defensins and hsCRP levels in inflammatory response of standard and laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy (2012 (26):627-631) [J] . TsimoyiannisE.C., TsimogiannisK.E. Surgical Endoscopy . 2013,第8期

机译：回复：Doi：10.1007 / s00464-010-0887-3：回复：单次脐带切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经典腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疼痛评分不同：一项随机试验（2010（24）：1842-1848）和doi：10.1007 / s00464 -011-1921-9：Re：标准和腹腔镜单点胆囊切除术的炎症反应中的α-防御素和hsCRP水平（2012（26）：627-631）
4. Skills Acquired on Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Simulators Transfer into the Operating Room in a Blinded, Randomised, Controlled Trial [C] . COSMAN, PH, Hugh, Medicine Meets Virtual Reality . 2007

机译：在虚拟现实中获得的技能腹腔镜模拟器在盲目的，随机的对照试验中转移到手术室
5. Use, Cost, and Comparative Effectiveness of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy at U.S. Hospitals [D] . Chaudhry, Mubashir Tufail. 2018

机译：美国医院使用机器人对腹腔镜和开放性胆囊切除术的使用，成本和比较效果
6. Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: Health status in a blind randomised trial [O] . Frederik Keus, Jolanda de Vries, Hein G. Gooszen, -1

机译：腹腔镜与小切口胆囊切除术：一项盲目的随机试验的健康状况
7. Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy:Health status in a blind randomised trial [O] . Keus, Frederik, de Vries, Jolanda, Gooszen, Hein G., 2008

机译：腹腔镜与小切口胆囊切除术：一项盲目的随机试验的健康状况

Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: Health status in a blind randomised trial

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅