首页> 外文期刊>Survival >Libya and the Responsibilities of Power
【24h】

Libya and the Responsibilities of Power

机译:利比亚与权力责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

From the beginning of protests in Libya's second city, Benghazi, the emerging international 'semi-order' has performed better than we might have anticipated. In the face of a civilian uprising and Libyan leader Muammar Gadhafi's threats to crush it, the UN Security Council moved swiftly to adopt sanctions and refer Gadhafi and key allies to the International Criminal Court, invoking the 'responsibility to protect' concept in Resolution 1970. This, combined with the Arab League's call for imposition of a no-fly zone, created a sense of unity and resolve. Only the African Union dithered. Later, though, a 10-0-5 vot on Security Council Resolution 1973 to actually implement the responsibility to protect, through a no-fly zone and additional military action, showed underlying divisions. Some argued that abstentions rather than 'no' votes were a glass half full. Since the vote, sharp criticisms from Russia and India about of the West's use of force, in public and in the Security Council, have amplified the sense of division.
机译:从利比亚第二大城市班加西的抗议活动开始以来,新兴的国际“半秩序”的表现就比我们预期的要好。面对平民起义和利比亚领导人穆阿迈尔·卡扎菲(Muammar Gadhafi)威胁要粉碎它,联合国安理会迅速采取制裁措施,将卡扎菲和主要盟友移交给国际刑事法院,援引1970号决议中的“保护责任”概念。这与阿拉伯联盟要求实行禁飞区的呼吁相结合,产生了团结和决心。只有非洲联盟颤抖。不过,后来对安理会第1973号决议进行的10-0-5表决实际上行使了通过禁飞区和采取额外军事行动进行保护的责任,这显示出潜在的分歧。一些人认为,弃权而不是“否”票是半满的。自投票以来,俄罗斯和印度对西方在公开场合和安全理事会中使用武力的尖锐批评加剧了分裂感。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Survival》 |2011年第3期|p.51-60|共10页
  • 作者

    Bruce D. Jones;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号