首页> 外文期刊>Synthese >On Reichenbach’s argument for scientific realism
【24h】

On Reichenbach’s argument for scientific realism

机译:论赖兴巴赫的科学现实主义论点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this paper is to articulate, discuss in detail and criticise Reichenbach’s sophisticated and complex argument for scientific realism. Reichenbach’s argument has two parts. The first part aims to show how there can be reasonable belief in unobservable entities, though the truth of claims about them is not given directly in experience. The second part aims to extent the argument of the first part to the case of realism about the external world, conceived of as a world of independently existing entities distinct from sensations. It is argued that the success of the first part depends on a change of perspective, where unobservable entities are viewed as projective complexes vis-à-vis their observable symptoms, or effects. It is also argued that there is an essential difference between the two parts of the argument, which Reichenbach comes (somewhat reluctantly) to accept.
机译:本文旨在阐明,详细讨论和批评赖兴巴赫关于科学现实主义的复杂论据。赖兴巴赫的论点分为两部分。第一部分旨在说明对不可观察实体的合理信念,尽管经验中并未直接给出关于它们的主张的真相。第二部分旨在将第一部分的论点扩展到关于外部世界的现实主义案例中,该现实世界被认为是一个独立于存在而没有感觉的独立实体的世界。有人认为,第一部分的成功取决于视角的改变,其中不可观察的实体相对于其可观察的症状或效应被视为投射复合体。也有人争辩说,论点的两个部分之间存在本质的区别,赖兴巴赫来了(有些勉强地接受了)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号