...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Does the analysis of innovation barriers perceived by high growth firms provide information on innovation policy priorities?
【24h】

Does the analysis of innovation barriers perceived by high growth firms provide information on innovation policy priorities?

机译：高增长公司认为的创新障碍分析是否提供了有关创新政策重点的信息？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

High growth firms and reducing innovation barriers figure high in the European innovation policy debate. Do high growth firms face specific innovation barriers which are relevant for innovation policy? In this paper we study the robustness of the perception of innovation barriers when alternative definitions of high growth firms are used. Using data from two waves of the European Innovation survey (CIS 4 and CIS 2006) we show not only that different definitions of high growth firms lead to quite different results across country groups, but also that the results are quite different for the CIS 4 and CIS 2006 samples. We argue that in the light of the available empirical evidence this non-robustness should not come as a surprise and that this negative result makes it difficult to specifically target high growth firms with public policies. Fostering the emergence of high growth innovative firms in Europe may not be feasible with targeted funding policies only but needs a systemic approach.
机译：在欧洲创新政策辩论中，高成长性公司和减少创新壁垒非常重要。高成长性公司是否面临与创新政策相关的特定创新障碍？在本文中，我们研究了使用高增长企业的替代定义时创新障碍感知的鲁棒性。使用来自两次欧洲创新调查的数据（CIS 4和CIS 2006），我们不仅显示出高增长公司的不同定义导致不同国家集团的结果截然不同，而且CIS 4和CIS的结果也截然不同。 CIS 2006样本。我们认为，根据现有的经验证据，这种非稳健性不应令人感到意外，而且这种负面结果使得很难通过公共政策专门针对高增长公司。仅在有针对性的融资政策下，要在欧洲培育高增长的创新型公司可能并不可行，而需要采取系统的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号