...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Economics >Bootleggers and Baptists: How Economic Forces and Moral Persuasion Interact to Shape Regulatory Politics
【24h】

Bootleggers and Baptists: How Economic Forces and Moral Persuasion Interact to Shape Regulatory Politics

机译：盗版者和浸信者：经济力量和道德说服力如何相互作用以塑造监管政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Bootleggers and Baptists is a colorful metaphor that may spark perhaps some religious connotations. However, it is just a colorful metaphor that describes the regulatory process in the United States that some people may deem as a burden. This book describes the dichotomy between the demands of the progressives to demand bigger government to solve problems versus the conservatives that believe bigger corporations is the way to go. This book attempts to answer the following question: where do economic regulations come from? Typical citizens would automatically presume the regulation would be promulgated by the actions of the President or Congress. However, the authors contend that the answer is more complicated than that. In economics textbooks, the general notion for the development of regulations is the correction of market failures. However, the authors argue that promulgation of regulations is caused by, and further shaped by, a combination of two distinct groups: Baptists and Bootleggers. This distinction between the Bootleggers and Baptists was espoused some 30 years before the publication of this book. In 1983, Bruce Yandle published an article in the journal, Regulation that distinguishes between these two groups. Yandle noted that public policies tend to be supported by "bootleggers," who saw their incomes increase as a result of a particular policy (as bootleggers did under Prohibition and under Blue Laws), and "Baptists," who supported public policies for moral reasons (Baptists tended to support prohibition and Blue Laws because they believed that alcohol was bad).
机译：盗贼和浸信会是一个丰富多彩的隐喻，可能激发出某些宗教含义。但是，这只是一个生动的比喻，它描述了某些人可能认为是美国负担的美国监管程序。本书描述了进步主义者要求更大的政府解决问题的要求与保守主义者之间的二分法，保守派认为更大的公司是要走的路。本书试图回答以下问题：经济法规从何而来？典型的公民会自动假定该法规将由总统或国会的行动颁布。但是，作者认为答案比那还要复杂。在经济学教科书中，制定法规的一般概念是纠正市场失灵。但是，作者认为，法规的颁布是由两个不同的团体（浸信会和赃物贩子）的组合引起的，并进一步受到影响。在这本书出版之前的30年左右，就开始了对盗窃者和浸信者的区分。 1983年，布鲁斯·扬德尔（Bruce Yandle）在《管制》杂志上发表了一篇文章，区分了这两个群体。 Yandle指出，公共政策往往受到“盗版者”的支持，“盗版者”由于特定的政策而增加了收入（就像“盗版者”在《禁止法》和《蓝色法》下所做的那样），而“浸信会”则出于道德原因支持公共政策。 （浸信会倾向于支持禁酒令和蓝色法律，因为他们认为酒精是有害的）。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Journal of Economics》 |2017年第1期|86-88|共3页
  • 作者

    Brian W. Sloboda;

  • 作者单位

    University of Phoenix School of Advanced Studies Center for Management and Entrepreneurship;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号