首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Ethics >Sterba on Affirmative Action, or, it Never was the bus, it was Us!
【24h】

Sterba on Affirmative Action, or, it Never was the bus, it was Us!

机译:Sterba采取平权行动,或者,这不是公共汽车,而是我们!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Professor Sterba argues for two interesting and provocative positions regarding affirmative action. First, affirmative action programs are still needed to ensure diversity in educational institutions of higher learning. Secondly, the proponents and opponents of affirmative action are not as far apart as they seem to think. To this end, he proposes a position that would give weight to race as a category for affirmative action that can withstand the challenges of affirmative action opponents while giving the needed support for affirmative action proponents. It is his contention that both sides can support arguments for diversity affirmative action. This paper raises concerns about the ability of arguments for racial diversity to resolve or bring together opponents and proponents of affirmative action. It is argued that the negative social climate, regarding the social and intellectual merits of black Americans, works against the acceptance of affirmative action programs. In sum, it is argued that Professor Sterba’s position continues to put the social onus of changing racial attitudes on blacks with little or no effort on the part of whites other than allowing blacks admittance to formerly segregated educational institutions to interact with white students.
机译:斯特巴(Sterba)教授主张就平权行动提出两个有趣和挑衅的立场。首先,仍然需要采取平权行动方案,以确保高等教育机构的多样性。第二,平权行动的支持者和反对者之间的距离并不像他们想的那么遥远。为此,他提出了一个立场,该立场应将种族作为一种平权行动,可以承受平权行动反对者的挑战,同时为平权行动的支持者提供必要的支持。他的主张是,双方都可以支持关于多样性平权行动的论点。本文引起了人们对种族多样性论点解决或召集平权行动的反对者和支持者的能力的关注。有人认为,就黑人美国人的社会和知识价值而言,消极的社会气氛不利于接受平权行动计划。总而言之,有人认为,斯特尔巴教授的立场继续使白人改变种族观念的社会责任,而白人则几乎没有做出任何努力,只是允许黑人进入原先隔离的教育机构与白人学生互动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号