首页> 外文期刊>The RUSI journal >Salisbury, Novichok and International Law on the Use of Force
【24h】

Salisbury, Novichok and International Law on the Use of Force

机译:索尔兹伯里,诺维乔克和国际使用武力法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Following Prime Minister Theresa May's statement of 12 March 2018 in response to the Novichok incident in Salisbury, news reports and social media platforms were awash with talk that it constituted an armed attack by Russia against the UK, that the UK had a right to respond in self-defence, and even that an international armed conflict existed between the UK and Russia. The circumstances of the incident and the response of the UK government raise important questions of international law. Stephen Lewis considers whether the Salisbury incident, assuming it was carried out by Russia, amounts to an 'armed attack' for the purposes of Article 51 of the UN Charter, engaging the UK's right to forcible measures in self-defence, and explores the potential legal consequences of characterising the incident as a use of force.
机译:在总理特蕾莎·梅(Theresa May)于2018年3月12日对索尔兹伯里的Novichok事件做出回应之后,新闻报道和社交媒体平台充斥着有关言论,认为这构成了俄罗斯对英国的武装袭击,英国有权对此作出回应自卫,甚至英国和俄罗斯之间也存在国际武装冲突。事件的情况和英国政府的回应提出了重要的国际法问题。斯蒂芬·刘易斯(Stephen Lewis)认为,假设索尔兹伯里事件是由俄罗斯实施的,就《联合国宪章》第51条而言,是否构成英国的“武装袭击”,是英国行使自卫措施的权利,并探讨了潜在的可能性。将事件描述为使用武力的法律后果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The RUSI journal》 |2018年第4期|10-19|共10页
  • 作者

    Stephen Lewis;

  • 作者单位

    School of Law, University of Manchester;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号