• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco control >A dual-frame sampling methodology to address landline replacement in tobacco control research
【24h】

A dual-frame sampling methodology to address landline replacement in tobacco control research

机译：在烟草控制研究中解决陆线替代问题的双帧抽样方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objectives We assessed the comparability of self-reported smoking prevalence estimates from a dual-frame survey with those from two large-scale, national surveys. Methods The Social Climate Survey of Tobacco Control (SCS-TC) obtained self-reported current smoking status via a dual-frame methodology in the fall of 2010. One frame used random digit dialling procedures and consisted of households with a landline telephone; the other frame consisted of a population-based probability-based online panel. Current smoking prevalence was compared with national estimates from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Results 18.3% (95% Cl 17.0% to 19.6%) of SCS-TC respondents reported current smoking. NHIS and NHANES estimates found 19.4% (95% Cl 18.8% to 20.1%) and 20.3% (95% Cl 18.7% to 22.1%), respectively, reporting current smoking. Conclusions Prevalence estimates for cigarette smoking obtained from the dual-frame SCS-TC are comparable to those from other national surveys. A mixed-mode approach may be a useful strategy to transition cross-sectional surveys with established trend data to newer dual-frame designs to maintain compatibility with surveys from previous years and to include the growing number of households that do not have landline telephones.
机译：目的我们评估了双框架调查中自我报告的吸烟率估计值与两次大规模全国性调查中的估计结果之间的可比性。方法：2010年秋季，通过双重框架方法，烟草控制社会气候调查（SCS-TC）获得了自我报告的当前吸烟状况。一个框架使用随机数字拨号程序，由带有座机的家庭组成；其他框架由基于人群的基于概率的在线面板组成。将当前吸烟率与2010年国家健康访问调查（NHIS）和2009-2010年国家健康和营养检查（NHANES）的国家估计值进行了比较。结果SCS-TC受访者中有18.3％（95％Cl的17.0％至19.6％）报告当前吸烟。 NHIS和NHANES的估计值分别报告了当前吸烟情况的19.4％（95％Cl 18.8％至20.1％）和20.3％（95％Cl 18.7％至22.1％）。结论从双帧SCS-TC获得的吸烟流行率估计值与其他国家调查的结果相当。混合模式方法可能是一种有用的策略，可以将具有已建立趋势数据的横截面调查过渡到较新的双框架设计，以保持与前几年的调查的兼容性，并包括越来越多没有固定电话的家庭。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Tobacco control》 |2015年第1期|7-10|共4页
  • 作者

    Robert C McMillen; Jonathan P Winickoff; Karen Wilson; Susanne Tanski; Jonathan D Klein;

  • 作者单位

    AAP Tobacco Consortium and Julius B. Richmond Center, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, USA,Social Science Research Center and Department of Psychology, Mississippi State University, One Research Park, Suite 103, Starkville, MS 39759, USA;

    AAP Tobacco Consortium and Julius B. Richmond Center, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, USA,MGH Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;

    AAP Tobacco Consortium and Julius B. Richmond Center, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, USA,Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA;

    AAP Tobacco Consortium and Julius B. Richmond Center, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, USA,Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA;

    AAP Tobacco Consortium and Julius B. Richmond Center, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号