...
首页> 外文期刊>Transport policy >Can street-focused emergency response measures trigger a transition to new transport systems? Exploring evidence and lessons from 55 US cities
【24h】

Can street-focused emergency response measures trigger a transition to new transport systems? Exploring evidence and lessons from 55 US cities

机译:街头紧急响应措施可以触发到新传输系统的过渡吗? 探索55个美国城市的证据和教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Transport planning and policy is increasingly being called to action in ways that differ from practices of yesteryear. Varied segments of society are increasingly looking to city streets?the workhorse of a city?s transport system?as places to enact change. Namely, to change their character away from the type of streets pervasive in auto-oriented urban environments. Acutely experienced during the disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic, emergency response measures from many cities across the world abruptly altered the nature and purpose of street space. These ?street experiments? fueled an opportunity, in part, to explore a transition to practices prioritizing forms of sustainable mobility such as walking and bicycling. This research inventories street-focused emergency response measures from the 55 largest cities in the US. We devise a rubric to systematically assess and locate characteristics of these measures that enable a transition. Results show that five ?innovator? and several ?early adopter? cities are using COVID conditions to test new forms of streets and in some cases, street networks. These cities excelled in conveying a vision for alternative future, articulating implementation pathways, leveraging political capacity, and circulating information. After six months, half of the cities continue their efforts, including only six which have expanded. The few showing continued strength demonstrate endeavors to evaluate the experiments, validate their feasibility, and embed the experiments into existing sustainability policy. These components, when leveraged together, could seed innovative break-throughs in how city streets are used, designed, and standardized. The paper establishes baseline evidence on which future research efforts can build and provides empirical evidence on early stages of the experimentation and transition processes of urban mobility systems.
机译:运输规划和政策越来越多地被调用以不同于昔日的实践的方式。社会各种各样的细分越来越多地展望城市街道?一个城市的运输系统的主营?作为制定变革的地方。即,将他们的性格从自向的城市环境中的街道普及。在世界各地的许多城市中断的Covid-19大流行中断的急剧经历突然改变了街头空间的性质和目的。这些?街道实验?部分地促进了一个机会,探讨了过渡到实践,优先考虑可持续移动性的形式,如步行和骑自行车。本研究清单从美国55个最大城市的街头专注于紧急响应措施。我们设计了一种系统地评估和定位这些措施的特征,可以实现过渡。结果表明五?创新者?几个?早期采用者?城市正在使用Covid条件来测试新形式的街道,并在某些情况下进行街道网络。这些城市表现出替代未来,阐明实施途径,利用政治能力和流通信息的愿景。六个月后,一半的城市继续努力,包括只有六个已经扩大的六个。少数人表现出持续的力量表明,努力评估实验,验证其可行性,并将实验嵌入现有的可持续性政策。这些组件在杠杆在一起时,可以在如何使用,设计和标准化的城市街道上种子创新突破。本文确定了未来研究努力的基线证据可以在城市移动系统的实验和过渡过程的早期阶段提供经验证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号