...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transport policy >Charging versus rewarding: A comparison of road-pricing and rewarding peak avoidance in the Netherlands
【24h】

Charging versus rewarding: A comparison of road-pricing and rewarding peak avoidance in the Netherlands

机译：收费与奖励：荷兰道路收费与奖励避峰的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The aim of this paper is to compare two congestion management schemes - road-pricing and peak avoidance rewarding - and their impact on commuter behaviour, based on two studies that were conducted in the Netherlands. The road-pricing study is based on stated preference data, whereas the study involving rewards was conducted in the context of a longitudinal field experiment. Given the substantial differences in data sources and analytical techniques applied beforehand, the comparison is made at an indicative level. It can be cautiously concluded that, as psychological theory predicts, rewarding is more effective in diverting commuters from peak periods. In both cases, the most popular alternative to peak-driving is off-peak driving. Most of the change in behaviour is attributed to introducing the new measure, whereas the impact of different price/reward levels is marginally decreasing in sensitivity and effectiveness. The short-term and long-term policy implications of these findings on the implementation of both measures are further discussed.
机译：本文的目的是根据在荷兰进行的两项研究，比较两种交通拥堵管理方案（道路定价和避峰奖励）及其对通勤者行为的影响。道路定价研究基于陈述的偏好数据，而涉及奖励的研究是在纵向田间试验的背景下进行的。鉴于事先应用的数据源和分析技术存在实质性差异，因此在指示性水平上进行比较。可以谨慎地得出结论，正如心理学理论所预测的那样，奖励在使通勤者脱离高峰时段方面更为有效。在这两种情况下，峰值驱动最流行的替代方法是非峰值驱动。行为上的大多数变化都归因于引入了新措施，而不同价格/奖励水平的影响则在敏感性和有效性上略有下降。这些发现对两种措施的实施的短期和长期政策影响都将进一步讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号