• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation planning and technology >Expertise in decision-making for large infrastructure projects: from UK trunk roads to High Speed Rail 2
【24h】

Expertise in decision-making for large infrastructure projects: from UK trunk roads to High Speed Rail 2

机译：大型基础设施项目决策方面的专业知识：从英国主干道到高铁2

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

At the decision-making stage, a large-scale infrastructure project is essentially a broad concept, and this means the expert analyses will differ from each other and become contested over time, leading to the emergence of rival narratives. It is only where there is a limited range of expert analyses that the bases for decision-making will remain relatively clear-cut. Over time the contested nature of expertise can significantly inhibit the construction of effective narratives, either for or against the project, and also make decision-making more complex and problematic. Decision makers may also seek greater clarification through the construction of narratives that rise above these disputed areas of expertise, and the scientific evidence becomes less important. This paper examines the changing nature of contested expertise through a comparative analysis of political decision-making between UK trunk roads policy and the case of High Speed Rail 2, through the framework of epistemic communities.
机译：在决策阶段，大型基础设施项目本质上是一个广义的概念，这意味着专家分析将彼此不同，并且随着时间的流逝而引起争议，从而导致了竞争性叙述的出现。只有在专家分析的范围有限的情况下，决策基础才能保持相对明确。随着时间的流逝，专业知识的竞争性质可能会严重阻碍有效叙述的构建，无论是对项目还是对项目不利，还会使决策更加复杂和成问题。决策者还可以通过构建超越这些有争议的专业知识的叙述来寻求更多的说明，而科学证据变得不那么重要。本文通过认知社区的框架，通过对英国主干道路政策与高铁2案之间的政治决策进行比较分析，研究了竞争激烈的专业知识的变化性质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号