• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Do light rail systems reduce traffic externalities? Empirical evidence from mid-size european cities
【24h】

Do light rail systems reduce traffic externalities? Empirical evidence from mid-size european cities

机译：轻轨系统是否会减少交通外部性？ 中型欧洲城市的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper examines the impact of urban light rail systems on congestion, travel time and pollution. Drawing on data from mid-size European cities, I estimate the impact of supply changes for the entire sample and applied a differences-in-differences analysis to a sample of cities that did not have rail systems in the initial year of the considered period. I find evidence that an increase in the supply of rail transport leads to less congestion, less travel time and less pollution. Furthermore, cities with a new rail system have on average 7% less congestion, 1% less travel time and 3% less pollution than cities with no rail systems. The results suggest that light rail systems have been successful in containing the negative externalities associated with car traffic in mid-size European cities.
机译：本文探讨了城市轻轨系统对拥堵，旅行时间和污染的影响。 绘制来自中型欧洲城市的数据，我估计了整个样本的供应变化的影响，并将差异差异分析应用于在所考虑期间的初始年份没有铁路系统的城市样本。 我发现证据表明，铁路运输供应的增加导致充血程度较少，行驶时间较少，污染较少。 此外，具有新铁路系统的城市平均较少7％，旅行时间减少1％，比没有轨道系统的城市减少3％。 结果表明，轻轨系统已经成功地包含与中型欧洲城市中的汽车交通相关的负面的外部性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号