...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Assessing the cost and CO_2e impacts of rerouteing UK import containers
【24h】

Assessing the cost and CO_2e impacts of rerouteing UK import containers

机译:评估重新运输英国进口集装箱的成本和CO_2e影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Among the most important trade-related issues currently confronting the UK are the environmental implications of very large volumes of containerised freight being handled at a small number of ports while there appears to be significant potential for using other ports and water-rail intermodal connections. Six UK ports are selected for the analysis: Hull/ Immingham, Liverpool, Felixstowe, Southampton, Dover and Bristol. Through an origin-destination analysis, the cost and CO_2e impacts of UK port trade patterns are compared using the actual situation against three proposed Scenarios: (1) the re-direction of containers by a combined expansion of Hull and Immingham; Liverpool; and Bristol, (2) moving containers by rail facilitated via expanded capacity at Southampton, and (3) moving containers by rail through expanded capacity at Felixstowe. The research found that transporting containers from Felixstowe and Southampton to the northern regions by rail has the lowest CO_2e impact, and is the most feasible option, although constraints exist in terms of infrastructure provision, water depth and rail network capacity.
机译:英国当前面临的最重要的与贸易有关的问题是,在少数港口处理大量集装箱货物对环境的影响,而使用其他港口和水铁路联运连接的潜力似乎很大。选择了六个英国港口进行分析:赫尔/伊明汉,利物浦,费利克斯托,南安普敦,多佛和布里斯托尔。通过原产地-目的地分析,将英国港口贸易模式的成本和CO_2e影响使用实际情况与三种拟议方案进行了比较:(1)通过赫尔和伊明汉姆的联合扩建来重定向集装箱;利物浦和布里斯托尔(2)通过扩大南安普敦的运力,通过铁路运输集装箱,以及(3)通过扩大费利克斯托的运力,通过铁路运输集装箱。研究发现,尽管在基础设施供应,水深和铁路网络容量方面存在限制,但通过铁路从费利克斯托和南安普敦向北部地区运输集装箱对CO_2e的影响最小,也是最可行的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号