...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Ranking the substantive problems in the Dutch Cost-Benefit Analysis practice
【24h】

Ranking the substantive problems in the Dutch Cost-Benefit Analysis practice

机译：在荷兰成本效益分析实践中对实质性问题进行排名

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper investigates the perceptions of key participants in the Dutch Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) practice regarding substantive problems when appraising spatial-infrastructure projects with CBA. Two research methods were applied. Firstly, 86 key participants in the Dutch CBA practice were interviewed in-depth in order to obtain an overview and a ranking of perceived substantive problems with CBA in the Netherlands. Secondly, the people interviewed were also asked to fill in a written questionnaire in which they were asked to rank the substantive problems once again, in order to improve the validity of the ranking; 74 of the participants completed this questionnaire. The most important conclusions of this paper are, firstly, that key participants in the Dutch CBA practice consider 'problems with the estimation of the non-monetized project effects' as the most important substantive problem cluster and 'problems with monetizing project effects' as the second most important substantive problem cluster. Secondly, key participants in the Dutch CBA practice consider the "problem analysis' in a CBA to be a very important substantive problem. Thirdly, there is, in a broad sense, consensus among the different groups in the Dutch CBA practice concerning their perception of the seriousness of problem clusters and the way they rank the problem clusters. Fourthly, a large part of the substantive problems mentioned by the key participants in the Dutch CBA practice are non-specific CBA problems.
机译：本文调查了荷兰成本效益分析（CBA）实践中主要参与者在评估带有CBA的空间基础设施项目时对实质性问题的看法。应用了两种研究方法。首先，对荷兰CBA实践的86名主要参与者进行了深入访谈，以获取对荷兰CBA实质性问题的概述和排名。其次，还要求受访者填写书面问卷，要求他们再次对实质性问题进行排名，以提高排名的有效性； 74名参与者完成了此问卷。本文最重要的结论是，首先，荷兰CBA实践的主要参与者认为“估计非货币化项目效果的问题”是最重要的实质性问题类别，而“货币化项目效果的问题”则是最重要的实质问题。第二个最重要的实质性问题群。其次，荷兰CBA实践的主要参与者认为CBA中的“问题分析”是一个非常重要的实质性问题；第三，在广泛的意义上，荷兰CBA实践中的不同群体之间就他们对以下问题的看法达成共识。第四，荷兰CBA实践中关键参与者提到的大部分实质性问题都是非特定的CBA问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号