• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Driving out of choices: An investigation of transport modality in a university sample
【24h】

Driving out of choices: An investigation of transport modality in a university sample

机译：摆脱选择：大学样本中的运输方式调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Transportation systems around the world have been designed in a way that emphasizes the pre-eminence of motorized mobility, in particular the private car. This has led to the emergence of transportation monocultures, defined as systems where the ability of travelers to use various modes is constrained. In order to create transportation polycultures, alternative modes of transportation must be available and users must perceive them as feasible alternatives to the car. This implies changing the modality style (a predisposition towards certain modes) and increasing the modality (number of alternatives available and feasible for use) of travelers. The objective of this paper is to investigate the modality of respondents to a travel survey in McMaster University, Canada. We define modality as the self-reported number of modes that respondents consider available/feasible for their daily commute, including the chosen mode. Analysis is based on the application of an ordered probit model. The results of our study indicate that modality is influenced by a combination of demographic, attitudinal and spatial/land use variables. With respect to mode of travel, active travelers tend to have a higher modality compared to users of motorized modes. Car users who live in more densely built environments are more likely to report higher levels of modality, whereas density reduces the modality of users of local transit. Distance from McMaster reduces the modality of car and local transit users.
机译：全球运输系统的设计强调了机动性，尤其是私家车的优越性。这导致了运输单一文化的出现，运输单一文化被定义为旅行者使用各种方式的能力受到限制的系统。为了创造运输多元文化，必须有替代的运输方式，用户必须将其视为可行的替代汽车的方式。这意味着改变旅客的方式风格（对某些方式的倾向）并增加旅客的方式（可用的和可行的替代方案数量）。本文的目的是调查加拿大麦克马斯特大学旅行调查受访者的方式。我们将模态定义为被调查者认为自己每天通勤可用/可行的自我报告模式数量，包括所选模式。分析基于有序概率模型的应用。我们的研究结果表明，模态受人口，态度和空间/土地使用变量的组合影响。关于出行方式，与电动出行方式的使用者相比，活跃出行者倾向于具有更高的出行方式。居住在密度较高的环境中的汽车用户更有可能报告较高的模态，而密度降低了本地交通用户的模态。与McMaster的距离减少了汽车和本地公交用户的使用方式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transportation Research》 |2013年第11期|37-46|共10页
  • 作者

    T.A. Lavery; A. Paez; P.S. Kanaroglou;

  • 作者单位

    McMaster Institute for Transport and Logistics, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton,Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada;

    McMaster Institute for Transport and Logistics, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton,Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada;

    McMaster Institute for Transport and Logistics, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton,Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Transport modality; Active travel; Attitudes; Ordered probit model; University sample;

    机译：运输方式;积极旅行;态度;有序的概率模型;大学样本;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号