• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation >Metropolitan size and the impacts of telecommuting on personal travel
【24h】

Metropolitan size and the impacts of telecommuting on personal travel

机译：大城市的规模以及远程办公对个人旅行的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Telecommuting has been proposed by policy makers as a strategy to reduce travel and emissions. In studying the metropolitan size impact of telecommuting on personal travel, this paper addresses two questions: (1) whether telecommuting is consistently a substitute or complement to travel across different MSA sizes; and (2) whether the impact of telecommuting is higher in larger MSAs where telecommuting programs and policies have been more widely adopted. Data from the 2001 and 2009 National Household Travel Surveys are used. Through a series of tests that address two possible empirical biases, we find that telecommuting consistently had a complementary effect on one-way commute trips, daily total work trips and daily total non-work trips across different MSA sizes in both 2001 and 2009. The findings suggest that policies that promote telecommuting may indeed increase, rather than decrease, people’s travel demand, regardless of the size of the MSA. This seems to contradict what telecommuting policies are designed for. In addition, model results show that the complementary impact of telecommuting on daily travel is lower in larger MSAs, in terms of both daily total work trips and daily total non-work trips.
机译：决策者已经提出将远程办公作为减少差旅和减少排放的策略。在研究远程办公对个人出行的都市规模影响时，本文提出两个问题：（1）远程办公是否始终是替代或补充不同MSA规模的出行； （2）远程办公对大型MSA的影响是否更大，在较大的MSA中，远程办公程序和政策已被广泛采用。使用了2001年和2009年全国家庭旅行调查的数据。通过针对两种可能的经验偏差的一系列测试，我们发现远程通勤在2001年和2009年期间在不同MSA规模上始终对单向通勤旅行，每日总工作旅行和每日总非工作旅行产生互补影响。研究结果表明，无论MSA的规模如何，促进远程办公的政策确实可以增加而不是减少人们的旅行需求。这似乎与远程办公政策的目的相矛盾。此外，模型结果表明，就每日总工作旅行和每日总非工作旅行而言，在较大的MSA中，远程办公对每日旅行的补充影响较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号