首页> 外文期刊>Transportation >Comparison on travel scheduling between driving and walking trips by habitual car users
【24h】

Comparison on travel scheduling between driving and walking trips by habitual car users

机译:习惯汽车使用者开车和步行旅行的行程安排比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research on walking behavior has become increasingly more important in the field of transportation in the past decades. However, the study of the factors influencing the scheduling decisions related to walking trips and the exploration of the differences between travel modes has not been conducted yet. This paper presents a comparison of the scheduling and rescheduling decisions associated with car driving trips and walking trips by habitual car users using a data set collected in Valencia (Spain) in 2010. Bivariate probit models with sample selection are used to accommodate the influence of pre-planning on the decision to execute a travel as pre-planned or not. The explicative variables considered are: socio-economic characteristics of respondents, travel characteristics, and facets of the activity executed at origin and at destination including the scheduling decisions associated with them. The results demonstrate that a significant correlation exists between the choices of pre-planning and rescheduling for both types of trips. Whether for car driving or walking trips, the scheduling decisions associated with the activity at origin and at destination are the most important explicative factors of the trip scheduling and rescheduling decisions. However, the rescheduling of trips is mainly influenced by modifications in the activity at destination. Some interesting differences arise regarding the rescheduling decision processes between travel modes: if pre-planned, walking trips are less likely to be modified than car driving trips, showing a more rigid rescheduling behavior.
机译:在过去的几十年中,关于步行行为的研究在交通领域变得越来越重要。然而,尚未进行与步行相关的影响调度决策的因素的研究以及对出行方式之间差异的探索。本文使用2010年在瓦伦西亚(西班牙)收集的数据集,比较了习惯性汽车使用者与汽车出行和步行出行相关的日程安排和重新安排决策。使用带有样本选择的双变量概率模型来适应前期的影响-计划是否按照预先计划执行旅行。所考虑的解释性变量包括:受访者的社会经济特征,旅行特征以及在起点和终点执行的活动的各个方面,包括与之相关的调度决策。结果表明,对于两种类型的旅行,预计划和重新计划的选择之间存在显着的相关性。无论是驾车还是步行旅行,与起点和目的地的活动相关联的调度决策都是行程调度和重新调度决策中最重要的解释因素。但是,行程的重新安排主要受目的地活动修改的影响。关于出行方式之间的重新安排决策过程,会出现一些有趣的差异:如果进行了预先计划,则与汽车旅行相比,步行旅行不太可能被修改,从而显示出更加严格的重新安排行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号