...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation >Do sharing people behave differently? An empirical evaluation of the distinctive mobility patterns of free-floating car-sharing members
【24h】

Do sharing people behave differently? An empirical evaluation of the distinctive mobility patterns of free-floating car-sharing members

机译：共享对象的行为是否有所不同？自由浮动汽车共享成员独特流动性的实证评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Characteristics of users and usage of station-based car-sharing services have been discussed in various studies. First analyses of the free-floating car-sharing model DriveNow have shown that member composition and patterns of use are not very different from those of station-based car-sharing schemes. Nevertheless, free-floating car-sharing members were drawn from a new pool of travellers, they were not attracted by existing station-based car-sharing schemes. This paper goes beyond these analyses and looks not only at the usage of car-sharing services but at the overall travel behaviour of free-floating car-sharing members (FFCS). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the specifics of this travel behaviour have been analysed based on substantial data that was collected specifically for this purpose with an innovative survey design based on a GPS tracking smartphone application. The goal of this study is to contrast the core group of members of the free-floating car-sharing model DriveNow (male, 25-45 years old) with people who do not use car-sharing. Key travel indicators are compared for FFCS and non-car-sharers (NCS) with a special emphasis on type and extend of multimodal travel behaviour within those two groups. The results show higher trip frequency for FFCS and differences in mode choice pattern. FFCS are more intermodal and multimodal in their behaviour. Shares of cycling are significantly higher, shares of private car trips are significantly lower for FFCS compared to NCS. The insights gained in this study can help cities and car-sharing operators to develop framework conditions and services that optimally integrate free-floating car-sharing services into the overall urban transport systems.
机译：在各种研究中已经讨论了用户的特征和基于车站的汽车共享服务的使用。自由浮动的汽车共享模型DriveNow的首次分析显示，成员组成和使用方式与基于站点的汽车共享方案并没有很大差异。然而，自由浮动的汽车共享成员是从一个新的旅行者群体中吸引的，他们并没有被现有的基于车站的汽车共享计划所吸引。本文超越了这些分析，不仅着眼于汽车共享服务的使用，还着眼于自由浮动汽车共享成员（FFCS）的总体旅行行为。据我们所知，这是首次基于基于GPS跟踪智能手机应用程序的创新调查设计专门为此目的收集的大量数据对这种旅行行为的细节进行了分析。这项研究的目的是将自由浮动汽车共享模型DriveNow（25-45岁男性）的核心成员与不使用汽车共享的人们进行对比。对FFCS和非共享汽车（NCS）的关键旅行指标进行了比较，特别强调了这两个组内多式联运行为的类型和扩展。结果表明，FFCS的跳闸频率较高，并且模式选择模式有所不同。 FFCS的行为更像是多式联运和多式联运。与NCS相比，FFCS的骑自行车的比例明显更高，而FFCS的私家车旅行比例则明显更低。这项研究中获得的见识可以帮助城市和拼车运营商开发出框架条件和服务，从而将自由浮动的拼车服务最佳地整合到整个城市交通系统中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号