• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>TriboTest >Comparison of Empirical Methods and Measurements for the Determination of Wear of Worm Gears
【24h】

Comparison of Empirical Methods and Measurements for the Determination of Wear of Worm Gears

机译：确定蜗轮磨损的经验方法和测量方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Empirical methods use the results of test bench measurements with varying gear running conditions (such as output torque, type of lubricating oil, and material of worm and worm wheel) to allow one to derive mathematical relations for more easily calculating the wear that occurs. In this paper the empirical methods of Neupert and Steingroever are applied to two worm gears and the results described. Also, test bench measurements on two different test gears (of different worm flank shapes and slightly differing material and geometrical dimensions) were carried out. For these measurements, two types of lubricating oils, mineral and synthetic, were used. The advantages and disadvantages of the empirical methods compared to the test bench measurements and computer simulations to determine the wear of worm gears (empirical calculations, measurements, and mathematical modelling and simulations) are presented and discussed in detail. These results should help to select the best method for each case of wear evaluation.
机译：经验方法使用在各种齿轮运行条件（例如输出扭矩，润滑油类型以及蜗杆和蜗轮的材料）下的试验台测量结果，以使人们能够推导数学关系式，以便更轻松地计算发生的磨损。本文将Neupert和Steingroever的经验方法应用于两个蜗轮，并描述了结果。同样，在两个不同的测试齿轮（蜗杆的侧面形状不同，材料和几何尺寸略有不同）上进行了测试台测量。对于这些测量，使用了两种类型的润滑油：矿物润滑油和合成润滑油。与试验台测量和计算机模拟（确定蜗轮的磨损）（经验计算，测量以及数学建模和模拟）相比，经验方法的优缺点被介绍和讨论。这些结果应有助于为每种磨损评估情况选择最佳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号