首页> 外文期刊>Tropical Animal Health and Production >Effect of carbohydrate sources and cotton seed meal in the concentrate: II. Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in beef cattle
【24h】

Effect of carbohydrate sources and cotton seed meal in the concentrate: II. Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in beef cattle

机译:精矿中碳水化合物源和棉籽粉的影响:II。肉牛的采食量,养分消化率,瘤胃发酵和微生物蛋白合成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Four, rumen fistulated crossbred (Brahman × native) beef cattle steers were randomly assigned to receive four dietary treatments according to a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement in a 4 × 4 Latin square design. Factor A was carbohydrate source; cassava chip (CC) or CC + rice bran at a ratio 3:1 (CR3:1) and Factor B was cotton seed meal level (CM); and 109 g CP/kg (LCM) and 328 g CP/kg (HCM) at similar overall CP levels (490 g CP/kg). The animals were fed 5 g concentrate/kg BW, and urea-treated rice straw (UTS) (50 g urea/kg DM) was fed ad libitum. Carbohydrate source did not affect feed intake, nutrient digestibility, blood urea nitrogen, rumen fermentation, or microbial protein synthesis; however, animals fed with CC had a higher population of total viable bacteria than the CR3:1 treatment (P < 0.05). Animals that received HCM had a lower total feed intake while ruminal pH was higher than the LCM fed treatment (P < 0.05). The population of total viable and cellulolytic bacteria in animals that received HCM were lower than the LCM fed treatment (P < 0.05). Moreover, use of HCM in beef cattle diets resulted in lower microbial protein synthesis when compared with the LCM fed treatment (P < 0.05) although efficiency of microbial protein synthesis was nonsignificantly different among treatments. Therefore, cassava chip combined with rice bran can be used in a concentrate diet for beef cattle. It is also noted that a high level of cotton seed meal in the concentrate may impact rumen fermentation and animal performance.
机译:根据4×4拉丁方设计,按照2×2析因排列方式,随机分配4只瘤胃杂(布拉曼×本地)肉牛ste牛接受4种饮食处理。因子A是碳水化合物的来源;木薯片(CC)或CC +米糠的比例为3:1(CR3:1),因子B为棉籽粉水平(CM);和109 g CP / kg(LCM)和328 g CP / kg(HCM),总体CP水平相似(490 g CP / kg)。给动物饲喂5 g浓缩物/ kg BW,并随意饲喂尿素处理的稻草(UTS)(50 g尿素/ kg DM)。碳水化合物来源不影响采食量,营养物质消化率,血尿素氮,瘤胃发酵或微生物蛋白合成;然而,饲喂CC的动物比CR3:1处理的总活菌总数更高(P <0.05)。接受HCM的动物的总饲料摄入量较低,而瘤胃pH值高于LCM喂养的治疗组(P <0.05)。接受HCM的动物体内的总存活细菌和纤维素分解细菌的数量低于LCM喂养的动物(P <0.05)。此外,与LCM饲喂处理相比,在肉牛日粮中使用HCM导致微生物蛋白质合成降低(P <0.05),尽管各处理之间微生物蛋白质合成的效率无显着差异。因此,木薯片和米糠可以用于肉牛的浓缩饲料中。还应注意,浓缩物中棉籽粉含量高可能会影响瘤胃发酵和动物生产性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号