...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Urban affairs review >Reclaiming the European City and Lobbying for Privilege: Business Improvement Districts in Germany
【24h】

Reclaiming the European City and Lobbying for Privilege: Business Improvement Districts in Germany

机译：夺回欧洲城市和游说特权：德国的业务改善区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) are an increasing global phenomenon. In diverse places, they are established and sought of as helpful means to improve urban places. BIDs are frequently seen as a showcase for new forms of globalizing urban policies. This paper contrasts and broadens the frequent examples from the United States and the United Kingdom with experiences from Germany. We argue that this presents not just another example of BIDs as a mode of global neoliberal urban governance in yet another country. Instead, our case study highlights the elasticity and resilience of said concept and the impact of local trajectories on the mobilization of modes of urban governance. Compared with other places, BIDs in Germany remain relatively weak in terms of financial power. Nonetheless, the case of Hamburg shows how they are made suitable for discourses and practices of a neoliberalized "European City."
机译：业务改进区（BID）是一种日益严重的全球现象。在不同的地方，建立并寻求它们作为改善城市场所的有用手段。 BID通常被视为城市政策全球化新形式的展示。本文通过借鉴德国的经验，对比和扩大了美国和英国的常见案例。我们认为，这不仅是将BID作为另一个国家的全球新自由主义城市治理模式的另一个例子。相反，我们的案例研究强调了上述概念的弹性和适应力，以及局部轨迹对动员城市治理模式的影响。与其他地方相比，德国的BID的财务实力仍然相对较弱。尽管如此，汉堡案显示了它们如何适合于新自由化的“欧洲城市”的论述和实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号