• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Urban Review >Contextualizing Policy Appropriation: Teachers' Perspectives, Local Responses, And English-only Ballot Initiatives
【24h】

Contextualizing Policy Appropriation: Teachers' Perspectives, Local Responses, And English-only Ballot Initiatives

机译：情境化的政策拨款：教师的观点，本地回应和仅英语的投票计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Few studies have focused on practitioners' perspectives on and interpretations of official language policies in schools and how such policies shape their practices. Teachers are an integral part of the process of policy appropriations that occur within and across policy levels (state, district, school, and teacher). Through interviews with eighteen elementary teachers, this qualitative study focused on the experiences of teachers in one district as they negotiated the impact of Question 2, an English-only law passed by Massachusetts voters in 2002. Specifically, the study examined the teachers' perspectives on the passage of a top-down English-only state law, its implementation in their district, and its impact on their classroom practices. The study illustrates the multiplicity of policy appropriation: interpretations of the meaning of the policy for practice varied according to policy level (intent of the law, district administrator's interpretation, school-based interpretations), often leading to contradictory discourses. As a result, the teachers in the study had to (be able to) negotiate often contradictory policy discourses in their daily practices. The findings also underscore the importance of contextualizing policy processes: teachers' views of Question 2 were shaped by their own beliefs but also by the way the district conceptualized and interpreted the law.
机译：很少有研究关注从业人员对学校官方语言政策的看法和解释，以及这些政策如何影响其实践。教师是在政策级别之内和之间（州，地区，学校和教师）进行的政策拨款过程中不可或缺的一部分。通过与18位小学教师的访谈，这项定性研究集中于一个地区的教师在谈判第二个问题（马萨诸塞州选民于2002年通过的仅英语的法律）的影响时的经验。具体地说，该研究考察了教师们对以下问题的看法：自上而下的仅英语国家法律的通过，在其所在地区的实施及其对课堂实践的影响。该研究说明了政策拨款的多样性：实践政策的含义的解释根据政策级别（法律的意图，地区管理员的解释，基于学校的解释）而不同，通常导致矛盾的论述。结果，研究中的教师必须（能够）在日常实践中协商经常相互矛盾的政策论述。调查结果还强调了将政策过程进行情境化的重要性：教师对问题2的看法既受其自身信念的影响，又受学区对法律的概念化和解释方式的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号