首页> 外文期刊>Water, air and soil pollution >Comparisons of Four Methods for Measuring Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Short-term Weathering Effect in Soils Contaminated by Crude Oil and Fuel Oils
【24h】

Comparisons of Four Methods for Measuring Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Short-term Weathering Effect in Soils Contaminated by Crude Oil and Fuel Oils

机译:用原油和燃料油污染土壤中总石油烃的四种方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) is an important parameter for evaluating risk and establishing cleanup requirements at petroleum release sites. However, different analytical methods may provide incomparable results. To select more appropriate method and design cost-effective remediation strategy, a comparison study of four analytical methods (gravimetric method, infrared spectrometry (IR), gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID), and ultraviolet spectrophotometer (UV)) is conducted for soil samples spiked by crude oil and fuel oils under both non-weathered and short-term weathered conditions. The gravimetric method produces higher TPH recovery for less volatile samples such as samples contaminated by motor oil and crude oil. The UV method reports very low TPH recovery and thus fails to provide the meaningful results in all tested samples. The IR method is a quick and relatively inexpensive screening tool and generally gives high TPH recovery, but the method precision and reproducibility are relatively low. The GC-FID method is relatively expensive and time consuming, but it has several advantages: (1) is more selective to hydrocarbons; (2) the method precision and reproducibility is relatively high; (3) is able to provide chemical fingerprint information. Therefore, appropriate method and should be chosen carefully depending on oil contamination type and investigation purpose. The results of short-term simulated weathering experiment showed 99.6% and 65.3% of TPH measured by the GC-FID method were removed for the kerosene and diesel contaminated soils after 14 days of weathering at 50oC, respectively. We have provided evidence that weathering is an important attenuation pathway at kerosene and diesel spill sites. We can design the most cost-effective remediation strategy according to different oil types spilled.
机译:总石油碳氢化合物(TPH)是评估风险和在石油释放地点建立清理要求的重要参数。然而,不同的分析方法可以提供无与伦比的结果。选择更合适的方法和设计具有成本效益的修复策略,对四种分析方法的比较研究(重量法,红外光谱法(IR),气相色谱 - 火焰电离检测(GC-FID)和紫外分光光度计(UV))是在非风化和短期风化条件下,由原油和燃料油掺入的土壤样品进行。重量法为较少的挥发性样品产生更高的TPH回收,例如由马达油和原油污染的样品。 UV方法报告非常低的TPH恢复,因此未能在所有测试的样本中提供有意义的结果。 IR方法是一种快速且相对便宜的筛选工具,通常给出高TPH恢复,但方法精度和再现性相对较低。 GC-FID方法相对昂贵且耗时,但它有几个优点:(1)更具选择性的碳氢化合物; (2)方法精度和再现性相对较高; (3)能够提供化学指纹信息。因此,适当的方法,应根据油污类型和调查目的仔细选择。短期模拟风化实验的结果表明,通过GC-FID法测定了99.6%和65.3%的TPH,分别在50oC的14天静音后,煤油和柴油污染的土壤除去了煤油和柴油污染的土壤。我们提供了证据,即风化是煤油和柴油溢出位点的重要衰减途径。我们可以根据溢出的不同油类型设计最具成本效益的补救策略。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water, air and soil pollution》 |2021年第9期|381.1-381.14|共14页
  • 作者单位

    China Univ Petr State Key Lab Petr Pollut Control Beijing 102249 Peoples R China;

    China Univ Petr State Key Lab Petr Pollut Control Beijing 102249 Peoples R China;

    China Univ Petr State Key Lab Petr Pollut Control Beijing 102249 Peoples R China;

    China Univ Petr State Key Lab Petr Pollut Control Beijing 102249 Peoples R China;

    China Univ Petr State Key Lab Petr Pollut Control Beijing 102249 Peoples R China;

    CNPC Res Inst Safety & Environm Technol State Key Lab Petr Pollut Control Beijing 102206 Peoples R China;

    CNPC Res Inst Safety & Environm Technol State Key Lab Petr Pollut Control Beijing 102206 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    TPH; Weathering; Gravimetric method; Gas chromatography-flame ionization detection; Infrared spectroscopy; Ultraviolet spectrophotometry;

    机译:TPH;风化;重量法;气相色谱 - 火焰电离检测;红外光谱;紫外分光光度法;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号