• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft >The EU structural funds as a means to hamper migration
【24h】

The EU structural funds as a means to hamper migration

机译：欧盟结构性基金是阻碍移民的一种手段

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Comparing the current economic situation of the internal markets of the US and the EU, two things are noticeable. On the one hand, the EU is conducting massive regional policy programmes (notably with their Structural Funds) to foster economic cohesion among the 27 nations belonging to the single European market while in the US with its 50 federal states such policies play a rather subordinate role. At first glance, this seems to be consistent with the fact that a low (high) inequality in the economic geography in the US (EU) is observable. Only 2.5 % of the total population in the US lives in regions with less than 75 % of the US average GDP per capita while in the EU approximately 34 % of the total population lives in such regions eligible for structural funds support. But by taking a closer look, on the other hand, it is revealed that the internal mobility of US citizens is significantly higher than that of EU citizens. According to economic theory migration, besides the free flow of goods, services and capital, plays an important role in assuring convergence in a common market. Following this strand of theory no regional policy is needed to achieve economic cohesion among the regions or nations of a common market. Thus, comparing the two internal markets, the question comes up if the lower degree of economic cohesion in the EU has something to do with the lower mobility of EU citizens and a higher degree of structural interventions? To answer this question, the paper consists of three parts. First, the theoretical background concerning migration and the potential need for regional policy is presented to find out if one of them is a better instrument to achieve a balanced economic development within an internal market. In the second part, I discuss the actual situation of EU internal migration and the structural funds of the EU. In the last part, I examine why migration rates are comparatively low and analyse the interrelation between the regional policy and (internal) migration in the EU. Besides other things like language, culture or institutions this paper is going to argue that structural funds are inhibiting internal migration, which is one of the key measures in achieving convergence among the nations in the single European market. It becomes clear, that the European regional policy aiming at economic cohesion among the 27 member states is inconsistent if the structural funds hamper instead of promoting migration.
机译：比较美国和欧盟内部市场的当前经济状况，有两点值得注意。一方面，欧盟正在实施大规模的区域政策计划（尤其是通过其结构基金），以促进属于单一欧洲市场的27个国家之间的经济凝聚力，而在美国的50个联邦制国家中，此类政策起着相当次要的作用。 。乍看之下，这似乎与美国（EU）经济地理区域中的低（高度）不平等现象是可以观察到的事实是一致的。在美国，只有2.5％的人口居住在人均GDP不到75％的地区，而在欧盟，约有34％的人口居住在有资格获得结构基金支持的地区。但另一方面，通过仔细观察，发现美国公民的内部流动性明显高于欧盟公民。根据经济理论，迁移除了商品，服务和资本的自由流动外，在确保共同市场的融合方面也起着重要作用。遵循这一理论体系，不需要区域政策来实现共同市场的区域或国家之间的经济凝聚力。因此，将两个内部市场进行比较，是否会产生一个问题，即欧盟内部较低的经济凝聚力是否与欧盟公民的较低流动性和较高程度的结构性干预有关？为了回答这个问题，本文包括三个部分。首先，介绍了有关移民的理论背景以及对区域政策的潜在需求，以找出其中之一是否是在内部市场内实现平衡经济发展的更好工具。在第二部分中，我讨论了欧盟内部移民的实际情况和欧盟的结构性资金。在最后一部分中，我研究了为什么移民率相对较低，并分析了欧盟的区域政策与（内部）移民之间的相互关系。除了语言，文化或机构之类的其他事物之外，本文还将论证结构性资金正在抑制内部移民，这是在单一欧洲市场上实现国家间融合的关键措施之一。显而易见的是，如果结构性基金阻碍而不是促进移民，那么旨在27个成员国之间的经济凝聚力的欧洲区域政策就不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号