• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Fate of abstracts presented at five International Conferences on Pharmacoepidemiology (ICPE): 1995-1999.
【24h】

Fate of abstracts presented at five International Conferences on Pharmacoepidemiology (ICPE): 1995-1999.

机译：在五次国际药物流行病学会议（ICPE）：1995-1999上发表摘要的命运。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: Meetings are an important way of exchanging scientific information, but full diffusion of new information can only be achieved when results are published in scientific journals. PURPOSE: (1) To determine the publication frequency of accepted abstracts for the yearly international conferences on pharmacoepidemiology (ICPE) and to examine predicting variables; (2) if published, to determine impact differences between 'oral' and 'poster' abstracts and to determine type and nature of publishing journals. METHODS: Abstracts accepted for ICPE 1995-1999, published in the official conference supplement of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, were included. Publication status for the information contained in each abstract was evaluated through MEDLINE and IPA searches. Impact factors of publishing journals were retrieved and journals were included in one of five groups. RESULTS: Overall, one out of three abstracts resulted in a publication in the peer-reviewed journals studied. Abstracts from NorthAmerica were more often presented orally than abstracts from Europe, but had lower publication chances. 'Oral' abstracts were more likely to be published than 'poster' abstracts; abstracts with a strong methodological content had a lower publication frequency. Most of the published abstracts were found in pharmacology and pharmacy journals (33%) and journals on specific clinical topics (30%). CONCLUSIONS: Only one out of three papers presented at ICPE ends up in established peer-reviewed journals. Although the publication characteristics for ICPE are not very different from other conferences, there are certain questions that warrant further investigation.
机译：背景：会议是交换科学信息的重要方式，但是只有在科学期刊上发表成果时才能实现新信息的充分传播。目的：（1）确定年度国际药物流行病学会议（ICPE）接受摘要的出版频率，并研究预测变量; （2）是否出版，以确定“口头”和“海报”摘要之间的影响差异，并确定出版期刊的类型和性质。方法：收录了ICPE 1995-1999接受的摘要，该摘要发表在药物流行病学和药物安全性官方会议补编中。通过MEDLINE和IPA搜索评估了每个摘要中包含的信息的发布状态。检索出版期刊的影响因素，并将期刊分为五组之一。结果：总体而言，三分之二的摘要导致在所研究的同行评审期刊上发表论文。与来自欧洲的摘要相比，来自北美的摘要被更经常地以口头形式展示，但是发表的机会较少。 “口头”摘要比“海报”摘要更有可能被发表。方法论内容丰富的摘要发表频率较低。大多数发表的摘要都在药理学和药学期刊（33％）和特定临床主题期刊（30％）中找到。结论：在ICPE上发表的论文中，只有三分之二被发表在公认的同行评审期刊上。尽管ICPE的出版特征与其他会议并没有很大不同，但仍有某些问题值得进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号